Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Use on Foreign Web Site Is Not U.S. 'Publication'
In a ruling of first impression, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware decided that photographs published on a foreign Web site weren't simultaneously “published” in the United States.
The photographer, the court said, wasn't, therefore, required to register the photographs with the U.S. Copyright Office prior to filing an infringement suit. Moberg v. 33T LLC, 08-625(NLH)(JS).
The photographs “Urban Gregorian I-IX” by Swedish resident Hakan Moberg had been published on the German Web site blaugallery.com in 2004. The photographs were subsequently displayed without permission by U.S.-based Web site companies that sold Web design templates.
District Judge Noel L. Hillman, sitting by designation in Delaware from the District of New Jersey, noted of Moberg's infringement suit against the U.S. Web sites:
First, the proposition that publishing a work on a [W]eb site automatically, instantaneously, and simultaneously causes that work to be published everywhere in the world, so that the copyright holder is subjected to the formalities of the copyright laws of every country which has such laws is contrary to the purpose of the [international] Berne Convention. ' To hold otherwise would require an artist to survey all the copyright laws throughout the world, determine what requirements exist as preconditions to suits in those countries should one of its citizens infringe on the artist's rights, and comply with those formalities, all prior to posting any copyrighted image on the Internet. The Berne Convention was formed, in part, to prevent exactly this result.
The district judge continued:
Second, also based on the purpose of the Convention to constitute 'a Union for the protection of the rights of authors in their literary and artistic works,' Berne Convention art. 1, the transformation of plaintiff's photographs into United States works simply by posting them on the Internet would allow American citizens to infringe on foreign copyrighted works without fear of legal retribution, since the majority of foreign works are never registered in America. While not all Americans would exploit such an advantage, the misappropriation of intellectual property remains a significant problem and there is no principled reason why domestic users should be able to act with such impunity.
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of our sibling publication, Entertainment Law & Finance. He is also an entertainment attorney, book author and associate professor of music and entertainment industry studies at the University of Colorado's Denver campus. He can be reached at [email protected].
In a ruling of first impression, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware decided that photographs published on a foreign Web site weren't simultaneously “published” in the United States.
The photographer, the court said, wasn't, therefore, required to register the photographs with the U.S. Copyright Office prior to filing an infringement suit. Moberg v. 33T LLC, 08-625(NLH)(JS).
The photographs “Urban Gregorian I-IX” by Swedish resident Hakan Moberg had been published on the German Web site blaugallery.com in 2004. The photographs were subsequently displayed without permission by U.S.-based Web site companies that sold Web design templates.
District Judge Noel L. Hillman, sitting by designation in Delaware from the District of New Jersey, noted of Moberg's infringement suit against the U.S. Web sites:
First, the proposition that publishing a work on a [W]eb site automatically, instantaneously, and simultaneously causes that work to be published everywhere in the world, so that the copyright holder is subjected to the formalities of the copyright laws of every country which has such laws is contrary to the purpose of the [international] Berne Convention. ' To hold otherwise would require an artist to survey all the copyright laws throughout the world, determine what requirements exist as preconditions to suits in those countries should one of its citizens infringe on the artist's rights, and comply with those formalities, all prior to posting any copyrighted image on the Internet. The Berne Convention was formed, in part, to prevent exactly this result.
The district judge continued:
Second, also based on the purpose of the Convention to constitute 'a Union for the protection of the rights of authors in their literary and artistic works,' Berne Convention art. 1, the transformation of plaintiff's photographs into United States works simply by posting them on the Internet would allow American citizens to infringe on foreign copyrighted works without fear of legal retribution, since the majority of foreign works are never registered in America. While not all Americans would exploit such an advantage, the misappropriation of intellectual property remains a significant problem and there is no principled reason why domestic users should be able to act with such impunity.
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of our sibling publication, Entertainment Law & Finance. He is also an entertainment attorney, book author and associate professor of music and entertainment industry studies at the University of Colorado's Denver campus. He can be reached at [email protected].
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?