Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As the worldwide economy expanded over the past decade, intellectual property (“IP”) assets have increased greatly in value and become an ever increasing share of a company's balance sheet. Now, as the economy contracts and many companies are facing bankruptcy, a key question concerns the status of the IP that may have been assigned, transferred, sold or licensed if one of the parties to the transaction declares bankruptcy. The answer may depend on whether the IP in question can be classified as a patent, copyright or trademark and the outcome of this inquiry may be critically important to any company that is in danger of losing its rights to manufacture a licensed product because the licensor declared bankruptcy, as well as to any licensor who may be faced with a totally new competitive landscape because the debtor-licensee sold its rights to the licensor's primary competitor. Accordingly, it is important for attorneys who specialize in bankruptcy law to be able to spot whether a particular type of intellectual property is a patent, copyright or trademark.
Overview of Federal and State Intellectual Property Rights
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.