Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the past year, federal and state governmental agencies have signaled their intent to more seriously investigate the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. For various reasons, employers often find it desirable to classify certain workers as independent contractors. Independent contractors are not covered by most employment laws because they are not employees. Additionally, classification of individuals as independent contractors deprives federal and state governments of tax revenue for such individuals, as they are not subject to payroll taxes. For instance, the federal government lost an estimated $34.7 billion in tax revenue between 1996 and 2004 due to such classification of workers. While there are instances where individuals are legitimately classified as independent contractors, such individuals are often in fact misclassified employees. Motivated by budget shortfalls and declining tax revenue, state and federal agencies have begun to aggressively police such instances of misclassification in an effort to recover lost revenue. Penalties for misclassification are severe and can put a company out of business.
Independent Contractor Versus Employee
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.