Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In order to encourage active and meaningful participation by creditors in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case, the drafters of the Bankruptcy Code included a provision therein which grants creditors an administrative expense claim for the actual and necessary expenses incurred in making a substantial contribution in a Chapter 11 case. In other words, where a creditor retains a professional to advance a particular position in a Chapter 11 case whose efforts result in the making of a substantial contribution to the case, such creditor can potentially get reimbursed for all of its out-of-pocket expenses, including for reasonable compensation for professional services rendered.
As with other important concepts found in the Bankruptcy Code, its drafters purposely refrained from defining the phrase “substantial contribution,” thereby leaving courts with the ability to exercise their discretion on a case by case basis. This discretion, however, has given rise to uncertainty as to whether, and to what extent, the intent of the creditor seeking a substantial contribution claim is factored into a court's consideration. This article: 1) discusses the standards that govern substantial contribution claims; 2) highlights several examples of substantial contribution claim requests that have either succeeded or failed, with a focus on the recent failed substantial contribution claim in the Tropicana case; and 3) explores how courts have considered the element of intent in adjudicating such substantial contribution claims.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.