Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Domestic violence is a critical workplace issue. According to New York City-based Safe Horizon, the largest provider of services to victims of domestic violence in the country, one in five employed adults is a victim of domestic violence. See http://www.safehorizon.org/safework/. Nearly 64% of employees who are victims of domestic violence have indicated that their ability to work is affected by the violence. Id. Employers are said to incur nearly $6 billion annually in health care expenses and lost productivity as a result of domestic violence. Id.
Economic Factors
As the New York State legislature has recently recognized, a domestic violence victim's capacity to escape an abusive relationship is often dependent on economic factors such as finding and keeping a job and gaining financial security and independence. See N.Y.A. A00755A, 2009-2010 Sess. (2009), available at http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A00755. Frequently, victims of domestic violence will need time away from work to meet with attorneys or counselors, attend court hearings, arrange for alternative housing or recover from injuries. Id. However, out of embarrassment or fear of losing their jobs, domestic violence victims will often fail to inform their employers of the circumstances. Id. Accordingly, “it is not unusual for a victim of domestic violence to be terminated from his or her job or demoted because he or she needs time of[f] or flexible hours as a protective measure.” Id.
Amending the NY Human Rights Law
On July 7, 2009, New York State responded to the issue of domestic violence in the workplace by amending its Human Rights Law to include “domestic violence victims” in the category of those persons protected from employment discrimination. See N.Y. Exec. Law ' 292 and ' 296 (hereinafter, the “DV Amendment”). According to New York's Division of Human Rights, the DV Amendment “further[s] the public policy of New York State by protecting victims of domestic violence from discrimination in employment so they may have the ability to deal with the unique circumstances of their lives and achieve financial independence from their abuser.” See http://www.dhr.state.ny.us/pdf/trifold-domestic_violence.pdf.
As shown below, the DV Amendment significantly impacts the manner in which employers and employee victims will deal with the repercussions of domestic violence in the future.
The DV Amendment
New York's Human Rights Law already prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of age, race, creed, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, disability, genetic predisposition or carrier status, or martial status. See N.Y. Exec. Law ' 296. The DV Amendment extends such protections to victims of domestic violence. Id. at (a)(1).
The DV Amendment defines a “domestic violence victim” as “an individual who is a victim of an act which would constitute a family offence pursuant to [N.Y. Family Ct. Act ' 812].” See N.Y. Exec. Law ' 292(34). A “family offence” includes an act of disorderly conduct, harassment, stalking, criminal mischief, menacing, reckless endangerment, or assault and attempted assault (as those terms are defined under the N.Y. Penal Law) that is committed between members of the same family or household. See N.Y. Family Ct. Act ' 812.
Other States' Employment Rights for Domestic Violence Victims
Several states have enacted laws to protect the employment rights of domestic violence victims. See, e.g., Cal. Lab. Code ” 230 & 230.1; Colo. Rev. Stat. ' 24-34-402.7; Conn. Gen. Stat. ' 54-85b; Fla. Stat. ' 741.313; Haw. Rev. Stat. ' 378-72; 820 Ill. Comp. Stat. 180/1-180/45; K.S.A. ” 44-1131 & 44'1132; 26 Me. Rev. Stat. ' 850; N.C. Gen. Stat. ' 50B-5.5 & ' 95-270(a); Or. Rev. Stat. 659A. 270-.285; R.I. Gen. Laws ' 12-28-10; and Rev. Code. Wash. ' 49.76.030. However, the requirements of each state's laws vary significantly. For instance, North Carolina and Rhode Island protect employee victims only in connection with their efforts to obtain orders of protection. See N.C. Gen. Stat. ' 50B-5.5 & '95-270(a), R.I. Gen. Laws ' 12-28-10. By comparison, other states such as California, Hawaii, and Kansas include seeking support services, medical relief and provision of safe housing among the activities for which covered employees are protected. See Cal. Lab. Code ” 230 & 230.1; Haw. Rev. Stat. ' 378-72; and K.S.A. ” 44-1131 & 44'1132. In addition, most states only protect employee victims from discrimination arising from having made a request for leave. See, e.g., Cal. Lab. Code ” 230 & 230.1; Colo. Rev. Stat. ' 24-34-402.7; Haw. Rev. Stat. ' 378-72; and R.I. Gen. Laws ' 12-28-10. However, Illinois includes a general employment anti-discrimination provision in addition to its section protecting leave requests by covered employees. See 820 Ill. Comp. Stat. 180/1-180/45.
While the laws above are intended to prohibit discrimination against employee domestic violence victims, many are limited to requests for leave. By contrast, the DV Amendment in New York protects employee victims from all forms of employment discrimination. Accordingly, the New York law imposes significantly greater requirements on employers in order to protect the employment rights of employee victims.
Implications for Employers with Operations in New York
The DV Amendment addresses the unique circumstances of domestic violence victims by making it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against victims of domestic violence in hiring, compensation, requests for use of leave, job advancement, or other employment practices. See http://www.dhr.state.ny.us/pdf/trifold-domestic_violence.pdf. Employers are now prohibited from treating an employee who is a domestic violence victim differently from any other employee because of that employee's status as a domestic violence victim. Id. For example, if the employer's policies provide employees with time off for personal needs or family emergencies (e.g., paid time off, sick leave or medical leave), the employer may not deny a domestic violence victim the opportunity to use those same policies to take time off, for such things as meeting with lawyers or counselors, attending court appearances, finding new housing, attending doctors' appointments, or seeking other kinds of domestic violence assistance. Id.
The DV Amendment also prohibits employers from terminating an employee simply because the employee is a victim of domestic violence. Id. Thus, for example, an employer may not terminate an employee because the employee's abuser shows up at the workplace, the employee has obtained an order of protection, or the employee's abuser violates the order of protection or becomes abusive toward the employee in the workplace. Id. Instead, “the police should be called as with any other person who engages in misconduct in the workplace.” Id. As is always the case under the Executive Law, employers are prohibited from taking retaliatory action against domestic violence victims for filing a complaint of discrimination. Id.
New York employers should also be aware that failing to comply with the requirements of the DV Amendment ' or any aspect of New York's Human Rights Law ' may result in civil penalties of up to $50,000 or up to $100,000 if the conduct was willful, wanton, or malicious. See N.Y. Exec. Law '297(4)(c)(vi).
Recommendations for Compliance
Employers with operations in New York State should immediately implement new workplace policies and procedures in order to ensure compliance with the DV Amendment. At a minimum, employers should consider taking the following measures:
1. Update all H.R. policies and procedures and employee handbooks to include victims of domestic violence as a category of persons protected from employment discrimination. As part of this process, review and revise, where appropriate, any procedures which may impact domestic violence victims. Examples may include procedures for requesting time off, anti-harassment and anti-discrimination procedures, or procedures for medical or family assistance. All revised policies should be explained and distributed to employees upon completion.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?