Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bankruptcy Rule 2019, an often-ignored pivotal procedural rule in U.S. bankruptcies, has returned to the public eye. This reemergence stems from two recent decisions from the influential Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (In re Washington Mutual, Inc., Case No. 08-12229 (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 2, 2009) and In re Premier Int'fl Holdings, Inc., Case No. 09-12019 (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 20, 2010)), as well as the controversial pending amendments to Rule 2019 proposed by the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States (the “Rules Committee“). The amendments were the subject of a public hearing held in New York City on Feb. 5, 2010.
The evolving judicial interpretations of Rule 2019 and the Rules Committee'fs proposed revisions will have a substantial impact on the landscape of distressed investing. If courts continue to require members of ad hoc groups or committees to disclose proprietary pricing information about their claims, or the proposed revisions to Rule 2019 become effective without change, distressed investors may be less willing to participate in ad hoc committees.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.