Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Movers & Shakers

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
March 29, 2010

MedStar Health (Baltimore/Washington DC): Oliver Johnson has been named the new senior vice president and general counsel for MedStar Health, a nonprofit provider with nine hospitals in the Baltimore-Washington region. Johnson previously served as counsel to the global marketing services division at Merck & Co. Johnson has also worked with nonprofit health care providers, as vice chairman of the Pennsylvania State Board of Medicine and with the Abington Memorial Hospital in Abington, PA, where he serves as vice chairman of the board.

Post & Schell (Harrisburg, PA): Paula Sanders, a partner in Post & Schell's health care, post-acute and long-term care group, has been appointed a member of the American Health Care Association's legal committee. AHCA is a national trade association representing the interests of nearly 11,000 for-profit and not-for-profit long term care and post-acute care providers.

Brach Eichler LLC (Roseland, NJ): Lani M. Dornfeld has moved from the now-dissolved WolfBlock to Brach Eichler as a member of the firm's Health Law Practice Group. Dornfeld practices in health, hospital and corporate law, providing legal counsel to hospitals, home health agencies, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, physicians, dentists and group medical and dental practices.

MedStar Health (Baltimore/Washington DC): Oliver Johnson has been named the new senior vice president and general counsel for MedStar Health, a nonprofit provider with nine hospitals in the Baltimore-Washington region. Johnson previously served as counsel to the global marketing services division at Merck & Co. Johnson has also worked with nonprofit health care providers, as vice chairman of the Pennsylvania State Board of Medicine and with the Abington Memorial Hospital in Abington, PA, where he serves as vice chairman of the board.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?