Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Pre-existing non-conforming use doctrine and “vested rights” doctrine are two different, but related, mechanisms for protecting landowners from the impact of a newly enacted zoning ordinance. Both are state law doctrines with constitutional underpinnings: they both operate to obviate the need for landowners to raise, and courts to consider, claims that a newly enacted ordinance works a “taking.” In Global Aggregates LLC v. Town of Yorkshire (NYLJ 2/19/2010, p. 41., col. 3), the Court of Appeals decided a case in which the landowner raised both doctrines.
The Case
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.