Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Verdicts
Exemption from Overtime As a Professional Requires Specialized Education
In Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp., 08-5847-cv (2nd Cir., Nov. 12, 2009), the plaintiff worked for three years as a Product Design Specialist II (PDS II) for the defendant company. When hired, he had some 20 years of engineering-type experience and his work involved complicated technical expertise and responsibility. Like all other PDS IIs, plaintiff lacked formal education beyond a high school diploma. Plaintiff was not paid overtime because defendant had classified PDS IIs as exempt professionals under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
After losing his job in 2004 due to a reduction-in-force, plaintiff sued the defendant under the FLSA, alleging his classification as an exempt professional willfully violated the FLSA. The district court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff on the ground that he was not an exempt professional. It found the defendant's violation of the FLSA willful. The circuit court affirmed, concluding that the plaintiff is not an exempt professional and that the defendant willfully violated the FLSA. The issue was whether a position can be exempt, notwithstanding the lack of an education requirement, if duties actually performed require knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science learning. The circuit court held that an employee is not an exempt professional unless his work requires knowledge that is customarily acquired after a prolonged course of specialized, intellectual instruction and study.
Exemption from Overtime As a Professional Requires Specialized Education
In Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp., 08-5847-cv (2nd Cir., Nov. 12, 2009), the plaintiff worked for three years as a Product Design Specialist II (PDS II) for the defendant company. When hired, he had some 20 years of engineering-type experience and his work involved complicated technical expertise and responsibility. Like all other PDS IIs, plaintiff lacked formal education beyond a high school diploma. Plaintiff was not paid overtime because defendant had classified PDS IIs as exempt professionals under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
After losing his job in 2004 due to a reduction-in-force, plaintiff sued the defendant under the FLSA, alleging his classification as an exempt professional willfully violated the FLSA. The district court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff on the ground that he was not an exempt professional. It found the defendant's violation of the FLSA willful. The circuit court affirmed, concluding that the plaintiff is not an exempt professional and that the defendant willfully violated the FLSA. The issue was whether a position can be exempt, notwithstanding the lack of an education requirement, if duties actually performed require knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science learning. The circuit court held that an employee is not an exempt professional unless his work requires knowledge that is customarily acquired after a prolonged course of specialized, intellectual instruction and study.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.