Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Verdicts
Exemption from Overtime As a Professional Requires Specialized Education
In Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp., 08-5847-cv (2nd Cir., Nov. 12, 2009), the plaintiff worked for three years as a Product Design Specialist II (PDS II) for the defendant company. When hired, he had some 20 years of engineering-type experience and his work involved complicated technical expertise and responsibility. Like all other PDS IIs, plaintiff lacked formal education beyond a high school diploma. Plaintiff was not paid overtime because defendant had classified PDS IIs as exempt professionals under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
After losing his job in 2004 due to a reduction-in-force, plaintiff sued the defendant under the FLSA, alleging his classification as an exempt professional willfully violated the FLSA. The district court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff on the ground that he was not an exempt professional. It found the defendant's violation of the FLSA willful. The circuit court affirmed, concluding that the plaintiff is not an exempt professional and that the defendant willfully violated the FLSA. The issue was whether a position can be exempt, notwithstanding the lack of an education requirement, if duties actually performed require knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science learning. The circuit court held that an employee is not an exempt professional unless his work requires knowledge that is customarily acquired after a prolonged course of specialized, intellectual instruction and study.
Exemption from Overtime As a Professional Requires Specialized Education
In Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp., 08-5847-cv (2nd Cir., Nov. 12, 2009), the plaintiff worked for three years as a Product Design Specialist II (PDS II) for the defendant company. When hired, he had some 20 years of engineering-type experience and his work involved complicated technical expertise and responsibility. Like all other PDS IIs, plaintiff lacked formal education beyond a high school diploma. Plaintiff was not paid overtime because defendant had classified PDS IIs as exempt professionals under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
After losing his job in 2004 due to a reduction-in-force, plaintiff sued the defendant under the FLSA, alleging his classification as an exempt professional willfully violated the FLSA. The district court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff on the ground that he was not an exempt professional. It found the defendant's violation of the FLSA willful. The circuit court affirmed, concluding that the plaintiff is not an exempt professional and that the defendant willfully violated the FLSA. The issue was whether a position can be exempt, notwithstanding the lack of an education requirement, if duties actually performed require knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science learning. The circuit court held that an employee is not an exempt professional unless his work requires knowledge that is customarily acquired after a prolonged course of specialized, intellectual instruction and study.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.