Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
April 27, 2010

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Alpharma Agrees to $42.5 Million Settlement of False Claims Act Allegations

On March 16, 2010, the DOJ announced that U.S.-based pharmaceutical manufacturer Alpharma Inc., now a wholly owned subsidiary of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the Bristol, TN-based corporation, has agreed to pay $42.5 million as part of a settlement of alleged False Claims Act violations tied to marketing efforts for Kadian, the company's morphine-based painkiller used to treat long-term moderate to severe pain. The settlement will also resolve a related qui tam whistleblower lawsuit brought against the company in 2006 by Debra Parks.

The False Claims Act allegations, encompassing activities from Jan. 1, 2000 through Dec. 29, 2008, allege that Alpharma used payments to health care providers to induce Kadian's promotion and prescription to prospective patients. Additionally, Alpharma is alleged to have misrepresented both the drug's effectiveness and its safety.

The $42.5 million settlement will be split amongst the federal government, relevant state governments, and Ms. Parks, with the latter's share deducted from the federal portion of the funds. Accordingly, the federal government will receive approximately $28.27 million, the states will receive approximately $8.9 million, and Ms. Parks will receive the remaining $5.33 million.

The DOJ noted that its has used the False Claims Act, which contains provisions enabling private citizens possessing knowledge of suspected fraud against the federal government to initiate a lawsuit on behalf of the United States and thereby split any subsequent recovery, to recover over $3 billion since January 2009. Of that total, roughly $2.2 billion was recovered in cases alleging federal health care program fraud.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Alpharma Agrees to $42.5 Million Settlement of False Claims Act Allegations

On March 16, 2010, the DOJ announced that U.S.-based pharmaceutical manufacturer Alpharma Inc., now a wholly owned subsidiary of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the Bristol, TN-based corporation, has agreed to pay $42.5 million as part of a settlement of alleged False Claims Act violations tied to marketing efforts for Kadian, the company's morphine-based painkiller used to treat long-term moderate to severe pain. The settlement will also resolve a related qui tam whistleblower lawsuit brought against the company in 2006 by Debra Parks.

The False Claims Act allegations, encompassing activities from Jan. 1, 2000 through Dec. 29, 2008, allege that Alpharma used payments to health care providers to induce Kadian's promotion and prescription to prospective patients. Additionally, Alpharma is alleged to have misrepresented both the drug's effectiveness and its safety.

The $42.5 million settlement will be split amongst the federal government, relevant state governments, and Ms. Parks, with the latter's share deducted from the federal portion of the funds. Accordingly, the federal government will receive approximately $28.27 million, the states will receive approximately $8.9 million, and Ms. Parks will receive the remaining $5.33 million.

The DOJ noted that its has used the False Claims Act, which contains provisions enabling private citizens possessing knowledge of suspected fraud against the federal government to initiate a lawsuit on behalf of the United States and thereby split any subsequent recovery, to recover over $3 billion since January 2009. Of that total, roughly $2.2 billion was recovered in cases alleging federal health care program fraud.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.