Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Alpharma Agrees to $42.5 Million Settlement of False Claims Act Allegations
On March 16, 2010, the DOJ announced that U.S.-based pharmaceutical manufacturer Alpharma Inc., now a wholly owned subsidiary of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the Bristol, TN-based corporation, has agreed to pay $42.5 million as part of a settlement of alleged False Claims Act violations tied to marketing efforts for Kadian, the company's morphine-based painkiller used to treat long-term moderate to severe pain. The settlement will also resolve a related qui tam whistleblower lawsuit brought against the company in 2006 by Debra Parks.
The False Claims Act allegations, encompassing activities from Jan. 1, 2000 through Dec. 29, 2008, allege that Alpharma used payments to health care providers to induce Kadian's promotion and prescription to prospective patients. Additionally, Alpharma is alleged to have misrepresented both the drug's effectiveness and its safety.
The $42.5 million settlement will be split amongst the federal government, relevant state governments, and Ms. Parks, with the latter's share deducted from the federal portion of the funds. Accordingly, the federal government will receive approximately $28.27 million, the states will receive approximately $8.9 million, and Ms. Parks will receive the remaining $5.33 million.
The DOJ noted that its has used the False Claims Act, which contains provisions enabling private citizens possessing knowledge of suspected fraud against the federal government to initiate a lawsuit on behalf of the United States and thereby split any subsequent recovery, to recover over $3 billion since January 2009. Of that total, roughly $2.2 billion was recovered in cases alleging federal health care program fraud.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Alpharma Agrees to $42.5 Million Settlement of False Claims Act Allegations
On March 16, 2010, the DOJ announced that U.S.-based pharmaceutical manufacturer Alpharma Inc., now a wholly owned subsidiary of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the Bristol, TN-based corporation, has agreed to pay $42.5 million as part of a settlement of alleged False Claims Act violations tied to marketing efforts for Kadian, the company's morphine-based painkiller used to treat long-term moderate to severe pain. The settlement will also resolve a related qui tam whistleblower lawsuit brought against the company in 2006 by Debra Parks.
The False Claims Act allegations, encompassing activities from Jan. 1, 2000 through Dec. 29, 2008, allege that Alpharma used payments to health care providers to induce Kadian's promotion and prescription to prospective patients. Additionally, Alpharma is alleged to have misrepresented both the drug's effectiveness and its safety.
The $42.5 million settlement will be split amongst the federal government, relevant state governments, and Ms. Parks, with the latter's share deducted from the federal portion of the funds. Accordingly, the federal government will receive approximately $28.27 million, the states will receive approximately $8.9 million, and Ms. Parks will receive the remaining $5.33 million.
The DOJ noted that its has used the False Claims Act, which contains provisions enabling private citizens possessing knowledge of suspected fraud against the federal government to initiate a lawsuit on behalf of the United States and thereby split any subsequent recovery, to recover over $3 billion since January 2009. Of that total, roughly $2.2 billion was recovered in cases alleging federal health care program fraud.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?