Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This article: 1) summarizes the evolution of safe harbor protections for financial transactions under the Bankruptcy Code; 2) briefly reviews case law developments involving ” 559 and 560 of the Bankruptcy Code; 3) identifies some key unresolved issues; and 4) concludes with some thoughts about whether or not these Bankruptcy Code safe-harbor provisions have some unintended consequences and can adequately address systemic risk in an environment of ever-changing complex financial transactions.
The Evolution of Safe-Harbor Protections
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.