Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The first three articles in this series (Commercial Leasing Law & Strategy, March, August, and September 2009) examined the issues involved when a tax-exempt organization leases improved property to one or more parties, or develops vacant land for lease or sale to third parties. The primary issues examined in those articles were how to structure the lease payments or the relationship with the developer of the land to avoid having payments to the tax-exempt organization subject to tax for engaging in a business unrelated to the organization's exempt purpose. In these earlier articles, a basic assumption was that the tax-exempt organization did not carry or incur any debt with respect to the real estate in question.
This article, the last in the series, examines the issues involved when a tax-exempt organization carries or incurs debt with respect to real estate from, or to which, it receives income unrelated to its exempt purposes. This is an important consideration, because the presence of such debt may negate any advantage obtained by the careful structuring of the transactions, as discussed in the earlier articles, with respect to avoiding tax on unrelated business income.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.