Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Zoning and Land Use
In City of New Haven v. Flying J., Inc., 912 N.E.2d 420, (Ind.App. 2009), a developer acquired property with the notion of developing a substantial travel plaza for trucks, campers and other travelers. The City ruled that the C-1 zone that applied to the property permitted some of the projected uses in the center, but not all. A trial court agreed. The court of appeals ruled that the C-1 zone did permit such uses, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings. At some point during the process of litigation, the City amended the zoning ordinance to establish a limit of two acres for service stations, together with accessory uses and structures. The amendment eliminated the developer's project, which was much larger than two acres, but permitted under the prior ordinance.
The court of appeals held that the City's amended ordinance did not apply to the developer's plan to build its travel plaza because the developer had established a “vested right” to develop the plaza, although it had undertaken no direct construction and had not obtained a building permit. The court noted that while construction definitely does establish a vested right, mere preliminary work, including filing of a building permit.
Zoning and Land Use
The court of appeals held that the City's amended ordinance did not apply to the developer's plan to build its travel plaza because the developer had established a “vested right” to develop the plaza, although it had undertaken no direct construction and had not obtained a building permit. The court noted that while construction definitely does establish a vested right, mere preliminary work, including filing of a building permit.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?