Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Three Judges Say Vaccines Did Not Cause Autism
The three claimants who a year ago were denied compensation from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)(See 42 U.S.C. ' 300aa-10, et. seq.) because they could not prove a cause-and-effect connection between childhood vaccinations and their development of autism have lost their bids to have those decisions overturned. In order to collect from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the claimants had to show that: 1) their child received a vaccine covered by VICP; 2) the vaccine was given in the United States; 3) the child suffered a serious and long-term injury because of the vaccination; and 4) there has been no previous award or settlement concerning that injury. In the rulings in the three cases, issued on the same day in March by three different judges, claimants learned the judges had rejected their proffered evidence, finding it inadequate for a showing that the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal used in vaccines harmed their children.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.