Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Given that the story lines played out in Superman comic books are full of shadowy figures with dark motivations, it seems fitting that the real world legal fight over who owns the rights to the Man of Steel would feature such a character in a pivotal role. Call him The Vanisher. On May 14, in what The New York Times labeled “an aggressive move to defend its 'Superman' franchise,” Warner Bros. sued Marc Toberoff, the lawyer for the comic icon's co-creators' families, in federal court in Los Angeles, accusing him of engaging in a “scheme” to “enrich himself” by trying to wrongfully seize control of a substantial chunk of the Superman property.
In its 56-page complaint (see, http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/files/supermancomplaint.pdf), Warner Bros., represented by O'Melveny & Myers partner Daniel Petrocelli, alleges that Toberoff “orchestrated a web of collusive agreements concerning the Superman copyrights with the heirs to the co-creators of Superman, Jerome Siegel and Joseph Shuster,” that, as the Los Angeles Times reported it, “caused the families to repudiate their agreements with DC Comics in a bid to recapture the copyright to the character.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.