Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

BAPCPA: Another Nail in the Coffin of Retail Reorganizations

By Yitzhak Greenberg
June 18, 2010

The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”) has had a profound effect on retail reorganizations, particularly, the restriction on bankruptcy courts' broad discretion to extend debtors' time to assume or reject leases. This shortened time period, a maximum of 210 days, has been alleged to be responsible for the death of retail reorganizations. Did BAPCPA further impact the debtor/landlord relationship ' by limiting the right to assign shopping center leases burdened by a clause requiring a use that either no longer exists or is economically unfeasible, e.g., Saturn dealerships, video rentals, beeper sales or typewriter repairs (“useless use clause”)? Under BAPCPA, courts' discretion to invalidate useless use clauses may be severely constrained. This dynamic combination of the time limitations and the strict enforcement of use clauses may effectively terminate many retail debtors' ability to assume or assign leases.

Prior to BAPCPA, courts considered these clauses de facto anti-assignment clauses and, as such, not enforceable. While 11 U.S.C. ' 365(b)(3) required adequate protection for the assumption of a shopping center lease (including use clauses), many courts balanced the rights of the debtor and shopping center landlords, excising useless use clauses pursuant to ' 365(f)(1)(addressing anti-assignment clauses). BAPCPA amended ' 365(f)(1) subjecting courts' discretion to modify use clauses to ' 365(b)(3) and, as such, many concluded that BAPCPA required strict compliance with shopping center lease use clauses, even useless use clauses. However, an analysis of the pre BAPCPA statute demonstrates that courts have liberally interpreted limitation on their discretion regarding shopping center leases. Thus, under BAPCPA, courts may continue to invalidate useless use clauses.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.