Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

BAPCPA: Another Nail in the Coffin of Retail Reorganizations

By Yitzhak Greenberg
June 18, 2010

The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”) has had a profound effect on retail reorganizations, particularly, the restriction on bankruptcy courts' broad discretion to extend debtors' time to assume or reject leases. This shortened time period, a maximum of 210 days, has been alleged to be responsible for the death of retail reorganizations. Did BAPCPA further impact the debtor/landlord relationship ' by limiting the right to assign shopping center leases burdened by a clause requiring a use that either no longer exists or is economically unfeasible, e.g., Saturn dealerships, video rentals, beeper sales or typewriter repairs (“useless use clause”)? Under BAPCPA, courts' discretion to invalidate useless use clauses may be severely constrained. This dynamic combination of the time limitations and the strict enforcement of use clauses may effectively terminate many retail debtors' ability to assume or assign leases.

Prior to BAPCPA, courts considered these clauses de facto anti-assignment clauses and, as such, not enforceable. While 11 U.S.C. ' 365(b)(3) required adequate protection for the assumption of a shopping center lease (including use clauses), many courts balanced the rights of the debtor and shopping center landlords, excising useless use clauses pursuant to ' 365(f)(1)(addressing anti-assignment clauses). BAPCPA amended ' 365(f)(1) subjecting courts' discretion to modify use clauses to ' 365(b)(3) and, as such, many concluded that BAPCPA required strict compliance with shopping center lease use clauses, even useless use clauses. However, an analysis of the pre BAPCPA statute demonstrates that courts have liberally interpreted limitation on their discretion regarding shopping center leases. Thus, under BAPCPA, courts may continue to invalidate useless use clauses.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.