Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
iPhones, BlackBerries, Wi-Fi hot-spots and wireless networking have made the “virtual workplace” a reality. For many employers, advances in technology increase employee availability and productivity during nontraditional work hours. For employees, being able to work from home creates better work-life balance. In a recent survey, 81% of respondents stated they would take advantage of the ability to telecommute from home, if the option was made available to them. (Workplace Options Inc.) Does that mean that the flexibility of a “virtual workplace” is always an attractive option for employers? Not necessarily. The virtual workplace and telecommuting arrangements create a number of potential pitfalls for employers that do not follow the “traditional” workplace model. When employers have employees who do not “power off” their BlackBerries and leave work at work, there are a number of important issues they must consider to manage the virtual workplace.
Limit Access to the Virtual Workplace
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.