Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Equipment lessors need to learn a new acronym: CERCLA. It stands for the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, and it has the potential to expose lessors to millions of dollars in environmental liability. This according to the recent Illinois federal district court case of United States v. Saporito, 210 WL 489703 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 9, 2010). Before discussing the case, some background is in order.
Cleanup of environmentally contaminated real estate is frequently a very expensive proposition. CERCLA (a/k/a Superfund) is the federal law that deals with the nation's most polluted sites. The cost of cleanup at an average CERCLA site is in excess of $30 million. To establish who must pay these costs, the federal law identifies four groups: 1) The current owner and/or operator of a facility; 2) the owner and operator of the facility at the time of the release; 3) anyone who arranges for the disposal of hazardous waste; and 4) a transporter of hazardous waste.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.