Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Equipment lessors need to learn a new acronym: CERCLA. It stands for the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, and it has the potential to expose lessors to millions of dollars in environmental liability. This according to the recent Illinois federal district court case of United States v. Saporito, 210 WL 489703 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 9, 2010). Before discussing the case, some background is in order.
Cleanup of environmentally contaminated real estate is frequently a very expensive proposition. CERCLA (a/k/a Superfund) is the federal law that deals with the nation's most polluted sites. The cost of cleanup at an average CERCLA site is in excess of $30 million. To establish who must pay these costs, the federal law identifies four groups: 1) The current owner and/or operator of a facility; 2) the owner and operator of the facility at the time of the release; 3) anyone who arranges for the disposal of hazardous waste; and 4) a transporter of hazardous waste.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.