Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

The State of the Credit Markets: Implications for the Restructuring Community

By James D. Decker and James S. Hadfield
July 27, 2010

Notwithstanding the market's recent shaky demeanor, the recovery of the credit markets from early 2009 has been nothing short of spectacular. The recovery in the secondary debt markets, which saw yields on first-lien paper decline from equity-like returns in the 20s to traditional single-digit levels, forced capital to return to the primary markets in a quest for yield. Consequently, borrowers were able to tap the new-issue market at greater volumes year to date than during all of 2009. This access to loan dollars fueled the refinancing market and even sparked leverage buyout and recapitalization activity. However, in the last couple of months, capital has begun to once again retreat from the market in the face of uncertainty in Europe and a slower than expected domestic recovery. Correspondingly, loan supply has surged as eager refinancing and buyout borrowers have flocked to a market perceived to be reopened. The impact has been a recent regression from credit recovery trends, calling into question whether the momentum from early this year can be regained.

The dynamics of the credit market, its recovery, and current state have numerous implications for workouts, restructurings, and reorganizations. With collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”)-backed funds accounting for such a substantial portion of credit in existence today, the diversity of interests and number of participants in any one facility has been greatly expanded. When considering the diversity of loan participants (CLOs, banks, hedge funds) and the fact that each might have a different cost basis in the same credit (e.g., some at par, some secondary buyers at premiums or discounts), the prospects of just reaching consensus within a single tranche of a capital structure can become daunting. The resulting outcome of such dynamics is that the role of the restructuring advisor, turnaround professional, and bankruptcy practitioner has continued to evolve in the current cycle.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.