Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

DOL: Same-Sex Partners May Qualify For FMLA Leave

By Brian D. Pedrow
July 29, 2010

In an Opinion Letter issued on June 22, 2010, the U.S. Dept. of Labor (DOL) clarified who may be a parent under the Family and Medical Leave Act, including same-sex domestic partners who stand in loco parentis to a child.

The DOL stated that, in the FMLA's definition of “son” or “daughter,” the in loco parentis provision would allow domestic partners to take leave in the case of birth, adoption or placement of a new child, or to care for a child with a serious health condition.

A 'Simple Statement'

The DOL reaffirmed its position that, under the regulations, the only documentation an employer may require to prove in loco parentis status is a “simple statement” asserting that the requisite family relationship exists. This issue was discussed in 2008 when the FMLA regulations were amended, at which time the DOL rejected employers' suggestion that additional documentation be allowed, including tax returns demonstrating financial dependence.

The regulations define “son” or “daughter” to include children for whom an employee stands in loco parentis. In its Opinion Letter, the DOL interpreted this provision broadly, acknowledging that Congress intended the definition of “son” or “daughter” to reflect “the reality that many children in the United States today do not live in traditional 'nuclear' families with their biological father and mother.” The DOL concluded that either day-to-day care or financial support may establish the in loco parentis relationship when an employee intends to assume parental responsibilities. It is not necessary, according to the DOL, that both factors be present.

No Limited Number of Parents

Under the DOL's broad interpretation, the FMLA does not limit the number of parents a child may have. For example, a child whose divorced parents each remarries could mean that the child now has four parents. Such relationships, whether biological or legal or neither, may entitle employees to FMLA leave. In particular, same-sex partners may care for a child if they otherwise stand in loco parentis.

Conclusion

Employers should review their FMLA policies to determine if modification is warranted, including, specifically, the portion of the policy defining qualifying family members for purposes of leave entitlement.


Brian D. Pedrow is a partner in the Litigation Department of Ballard Spahr's Philadelphia office, and a member of the Labor and Employment; P3/Infrastructure; Higher Education Groups; and the Health Care Reform Initiative. His legal practice consists primarily of representing management in employment-related litigation, including discrimination and harassment, labor arbitrations and negotiations, and employment contract, wrongful discharge, and tort claims. He can be reached at 215-864-8108 or [email protected].

In an Opinion Letter issued on June 22, 2010, the U.S. Dept. of Labor (DOL) clarified who may be a parent under the Family and Medical Leave Act, including same-sex domestic partners who stand in loco parentis to a child.

The DOL stated that, in the FMLA's definition of “son” or “daughter,” the in loco parentis provision would allow domestic partners to take leave in the case of birth, adoption or placement of a new child, or to care for a child with a serious health condition.

A 'Simple Statement'

The DOL reaffirmed its position that, under the regulations, the only documentation an employer may require to prove in loco parentis status is a “simple statement” asserting that the requisite family relationship exists. This issue was discussed in 2008 when the FMLA regulations were amended, at which time the DOL rejected employers' suggestion that additional documentation be allowed, including tax returns demonstrating financial dependence.

The regulations define “son” or “daughter” to include children for whom an employee stands in loco parentis. In its Opinion Letter, the DOL interpreted this provision broadly, acknowledging that Congress intended the definition of “son” or “daughter” to reflect “the reality that many children in the United States today do not live in traditional 'nuclear' families with their biological father and mother.” The DOL concluded that either day-to-day care or financial support may establish the in loco parentis relationship when an employee intends to assume parental responsibilities. It is not necessary, according to the DOL, that both factors be present.

No Limited Number of Parents

Under the DOL's broad interpretation, the FMLA does not limit the number of parents a child may have. For example, a child whose divorced parents each remarries could mean that the child now has four parents. Such relationships, whether biological or legal or neither, may entitle employees to FMLA leave. In particular, same-sex partners may care for a child if they otherwise stand in loco parentis.

Conclusion

Employers should review their FMLA policies to determine if modification is warranted, including, specifically, the portion of the policy defining qualifying family members for purposes of leave entitlement.


Brian D. Pedrow is a partner in the Litigation Department of Ballard Spahr's Philadelphia office, and a member of the Labor and Employment; P3/Infrastructure; Higher Education Groups; and the Health Care Reform Initiative. His legal practice consists primarily of representing management in employment-related litigation, including discrimination and harassment, labor arbitrations and negotiations, and employment contract, wrongful discharge, and tort claims. He can be reached at 215-864-8108 or [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.