Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Employment Law StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Employers Beware

By Rick Bergstrom and Mark Temple
July 29, 2010

The modern employee is increasingly mobile. According to an article published in Forbes Magazine in 2007, 85% of American workers expected to be employed by a new company within the coming 12 months. Moreover, in these difficult economic times, many companies are taking advantage of the opportunity to poach top talent from their competitors. According to an article published in The Wall Street Journal in February 2010, 70% of companies surveyed were very ' or somewhat ' concerned about losing top talent due to cutbacks made during the recession. Employee mobility, coupled with the exceeding ease with which confidential and proprietary trade secret information can be stored and transported, create the perfect platform for trade secret theft by departing employees. Indeed, in a recent survey conducted by Ponemon Institute, 59% of the individuals surveyed confirmed that they kept company information after leaving their former employer. This occurred despite the fact that 79% of the individuals surveyed conceded that they were not permitted to take a company's sensitive information.

Trade secrets, such as methods of manufacturing, targeted areas of growth, and customer sales data are often the “crown jewels” of a business. They have the potential to allow companies to gain a competitive edge in the marketplace and must be adequately protected. Further, given the risks and realities of employee theft of trade secrets, businesses should implement specific practices and procedures designed to protect their confidential information, lest they risk protracted and costly litigation. In addition, the risks and likelihood of hiring “contaminated employees” (i.e., individuals who have stolen trade secrets from their former employers) are equally great, and companies that do not take appropriate proactive precautions in the hiring process can unintentionally find themselves embroiled in time consuming and expensive litigation.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.