Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Alan Alonso and his wife applied for jobs with Huron Valley Ambulance Incorporated, were hired, and used the company's alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) program on multiple occasions. But when the results of the last step of the ADR program did not go Alan's way, he sued in court. The Michigan Eastern District Court found that the ADR program was binding, but the Sixth Circuit found these well-educated employees did not knowingly waive their right to sue in court ' and therefore denied enforcement of the company's alternative dispute resolution system. In light of this decision, general counsel for companies with ADR programs should ask themselves if their waiver needs to be knowingly executed and what steps should be taken to ensure it is binding. This article addresses these issues.
Alonso v. Huron Valley Ambulance Incorporated
In Alonso v. Huron Valley Ambulance Incorporated, (No. 09-1812, 6th Cir., 2010), Alonso signed an employment agreement/application during his brief interview. In part, it provided that all employment-related disputes would be exclusively subject to the Company's internal Grievance Review Board (“GRB”) which was a binding arbitration system not subject to any court proceeding. It also limited the statute of limitations to six months. No explanation of how the GRB operated was offered until a month after Alonso was hired. At that time, he signed a document saying he would familiarize himself with the program, but his post-hire assent to the program was not obtained. The terms of the underlying ADR program itself were not unique or troubling to the courts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.