Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that, in paying reduced royalties for English-titled instrumental versions of songs, Universal breached subpublishing agreements that Brazilian songwriters Antonio Jobim and Vinicius de Moraes entered into with Universal's predecessors-in-interest. Jobim v. Songs of Universal Inc., 05 Civ. 3527(PAC).
Jobim and de Moraes originally signed subpublishing agreements between 1962 and 1973 with Leeds Music Corp., Duchess Music Corp. and MCA Music Holland. (Both Jobim and de Moraes are now deceased.) The subpublishing agreements covered songs that Jobim and de Moraes wrote individually, as well as collaborations like “The Girl from Ipanema” and “How Insensitive.” The agreements gave the music publishers the right to create English-language versions of the compositions. Thus, Norman Gimbel was retained in 1963 to write English lyrics for four of the songs (including “Ipanema” and “Insensitive”) in exchange for a right to song royalties. To resolve subsequent royalty disputes, Gimbel entered into additional agreements with Universal in 1995 and 1999.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.