Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Drug & Device News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 26, 2010

Class Action Settled Decades After Infant Deaths

A settlement has been reached in a class action suit involving the deaths in the 1980s of 40 infants who were given E-Ferol, a vitamin E supplement manufactured by the now-defunct Carter-Glogau Laboratories Inc. and distributed by O'Neal, Jones & Feldman Inc. The $110 million settlement was approved by Judge Sidney Fitzwater, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The FDA never approved E-Ferol, which was administered intravenously to premature babies to prevent blindness and lesser visual impairments. The plaintiffs' suit claimed that the manufacturer and distributor led hospitals to believe the supplement had indeed received federal approval, and that it caused problems such as liver and kidney failure in hundreds of babies. A 1980s investigation of E-Ferol, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, found that the emulsifier Polysorbate 80 was the cause of the problems.

Group Accuses FDA of Foot Dragging

The Doctor's group Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine filed suit in July seeking to compel the FDA to tell diabetes sufferers that a change in diet may be as effective in combating their conditions as drugs. The group says a healthy diet may help many patients to avoid the need for drugs like Avandia, which carry risks of side-effects like heart attack and stroke. “People are getting sick and sometimes dying because they are taking a medicine they may not even need,” said Daniel Kinburn, general counsel of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. “A low-fat, vegan diet is clearly safer and at least as effective.” The group petitioned the FDA in 2007, asking it to advise health care providers and patients that “oral medications are not always necessary to manage diabetes.” According to the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the FDA violated the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to properly respond to the petition within a reasonable time, issuing only an “interim response” in which it stated it had been “unable to reach a decision” about the petition. The suit seeks an order compelling the FDA to respond fully to the petition.

Baxter Ordered to Recall Infusion Pumps

The FDA is requiring Baxter Healthcare Corp. to commence the recall of all its Colleague Volumetric Infusion Pumps. Numerous problems with the affected infusion pumps have been identified over the years, including battery failures, service data errors and unintentional powering off. The FDA has taken action against the manufacturer before, trying to get the company to improve its product's performance, but deficiencies persisted. The recall was ordered after the FDA rejected as unacceptable the plan Baxter submitted to it in April, which would have given the company several years to correct the problems. Baxter will have to provide replacements or refunds for the recalled devices, along with a guide to help customers affected by the recall to minimize disruption as they switch to other products.

Suit Seeks Judicial Oversight of Some Medication Decisions

The New Jersey Department of Human Services and the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services are being sued by a patient advocate group for forcibly medicating psychiatric patients. New Jersey allows patients in state hospitals to appeal medication decisions made one their behalf, but these appeals are handled within the hospital itself. Patients at private hospital facilities have no formal appeal rights. The plaintiff, Disability Rights of New Jersey, seeks a court order requiring judicial review when patients object to medication decisions made by their care providers.

Class Action Settled Decades After Infant Deaths

A settlement has been reached in a class action suit involving the deaths in the 1980s of 40 infants who were given E-Ferol, a vitamin E supplement manufactured by the now-defunct Carter-Glogau Laboratories Inc. and distributed by O'Neal, Jones & Feldman Inc. The $110 million settlement was approved by Judge Sidney Fitzwater, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The FDA never approved E-Ferol, which was administered intravenously to premature babies to prevent blindness and lesser visual impairments. The plaintiffs' suit claimed that the manufacturer and distributor led hospitals to believe the supplement had indeed received federal approval, and that it caused problems such as liver and kidney failure in hundreds of babies. A 1980s investigation of E-Ferol, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, found that the emulsifier Polysorbate 80 was the cause of the problems.

Group Accuses FDA of Foot Dragging

The Doctor's group Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine filed suit in July seeking to compel the FDA to tell diabetes sufferers that a change in diet may be as effective in combating their conditions as drugs. The group says a healthy diet may help many patients to avoid the need for drugs like Avandia, which carry risks of side-effects like heart attack and stroke. “People are getting sick and sometimes dying because they are taking a medicine they may not even need,” said Daniel Kinburn, general counsel of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. “A low-fat, vegan diet is clearly safer and at least as effective.” The group petitioned the FDA in 2007, asking it to advise health care providers and patients that “oral medications are not always necessary to manage diabetes.” According to the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the FDA violated the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to properly respond to the petition within a reasonable time, issuing only an “interim response” in which it stated it had been “unable to reach a decision” about the petition. The suit seeks an order compelling the FDA to respond fully to the petition.

Baxter Ordered to Recall Infusion Pumps

The FDA is requiring Baxter Healthcare Corp. to commence the recall of all its Colleague Volumetric Infusion Pumps. Numerous problems with the affected infusion pumps have been identified over the years, including battery failures, service data errors and unintentional powering off. The FDA has taken action against the manufacturer before, trying to get the company to improve its product's performance, but deficiencies persisted. The recall was ordered after the FDA rejected as unacceptable the plan Baxter submitted to it in April, which would have given the company several years to correct the problems. Baxter will have to provide replacements or refunds for the recalled devices, along with a guide to help customers affected by the recall to minimize disruption as they switch to other products.

Suit Seeks Judicial Oversight of Some Medication Decisions

The New Jersey Department of Human Services and the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services are being sued by a patient advocate group for forcibly medicating psychiatric patients. New Jersey allows patients in state hospitals to appeal medication decisions made one their behalf, but these appeals are handled within the hospital itself. Patients at private hospital facilities have no formal appeal rights. The plaintiff, Disability Rights of New Jersey, seeks a court order requiring judicial review when patients object to medication decisions made by their care providers.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.