Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Federal Circuit recently agreed to an en banc review of the admittedly scattered precedents concerning inequitable conduct. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9549 (April 26, 2010). In vacating its earlier panel decision in Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., 593 F.3d 1289 (Fed. Cir. 2010), the rehearing order sets out six issues surrounding the materiality-intent standard at the core of any inequitable-conduct analysis. In the meantime, the current materiality-intent standard continues to result in drastically different outcomes, even among members of the same panel. Such was the result in the Federal Circuit's split panel decision in Leviton Mfg Co. Inc. v. Universal Security Instruments, Inc., 2009-1421 (Fed. Cir. May 28, 2010).
The Leviton Case
In Leviton, the majority decision overturned a finding of inequitable conduct on summary judgment, remanding the case for an evidentiary hearing. Prosecution counsel was found to have withheld material information from the Examiner during prosecution with full knowledge of his obligation to disclose such information. Despite prosecution counsel's knowledge and the materiality of the withheld information, however, the majority was reluctant to conclude that prosecution counsel withheld the information with an intent to deceive. The court reasoned that in instances where summary judgment of inequitable conduct has been affirmed, the intent to deceive was inferred from an affirmative act on the part of the applicants and the misleading nature of such acts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.