Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The debate continues on how the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) applies to, and affects, ex parte communications in civil litigation. As a federal regulation applicable to all states, one would expect HIPAA to establish a modicum of consistency in how local jurisdictions determine the scope of ex parte communication allowed between defense counsel and the plaintiff's health care providers. At present, however, that is a dream deferred.
Appellate courts nationwide are wrestling with assurance that state discovery laws comply with HIPAA mandates for limiting access to an individual's protected health information (PHI). Not surprisingly, since there are variations among state courts' interpretations of their respective rules governing ex parte communications with health care providers, vastly different appellate court directives exist for complying with HIPAA. Some courts have held that HIPAA absolutely precludes informal ex parte communications between defense counsel and the plaintiff's treating physicians, while others have concluded that such communications are permitted.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.