Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Patent Re-examination

By Elizabeth Iglesias and Azar Mouzari
September 29, 2010

There has been a significant surge in recent years in the number of patent re-examination requests filed against patents asserted in litigation. Indeed, re-examination is increasingly being utilized by accused patent infringers as a cost-effective tool to challenge patent validity, derail patent litigation proceedings, and limit the accused infringer's exposure to damages. In light of this trend, strategy considerations for the use of parallel patent re-examination proceedings as a tool in patent litigation are examined below.

Re-examination is a patent office procedure for amending or correcting an issued patent and usually involves reassessment of the patent's scope in view of new information concerning the state of the art at the time the patent application was filed. Patent re-examinations are initiated by a request, typically by a party that has been or may be accused of infringement, to the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to re-examine specifically identified claims of a patent in light of prior art references. If the request raises a “substantial new question of patentability,” the request is granted and the PTO initiates a re-examination proceeding during which the patent examiner determines if the patent claims should be canceled, amended or confirmed.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.