Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
ERISA Deference: No Exceptions
Much of the federal litigation brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) involves efforts by the beneficiaries of ERISA-regulated employee benefit plans to overturn benefits decisions of the plans' administrators. One recent study found that 65% of ERISA lawsuits in the federal court system involve claims of interference with plan benefits. Pension Governance, Inc. and the Michel-Shaked Group, ERISA Litigation Study (2009), available at www.pensionlitigationdata.com/news.php.
The standard of review that a court applies to such benefit decisions can have a significant impact on the beneficiary's chances of success in the lawsuit. If the court reviews the decision de novo, then it may effectively ignore the interpretation of the ERISA plan performed by the plan administrator and independently review the plan in order to make a benefits determination. See Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, 542 U.S. 200, 210 (2004). At the other end of the spectrum of review standards, if the reviewing judge is compelled to apply a deferential standard of review to the decision of the plan administrator, then the judge is restricted to reviewing the decision for an abuse of discretion, and must uphold any reasonable interpretation of the ERISA plan offered by the plan administrator. McCauley v. First Unum Life Ins. Co., 551 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2008).
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.