Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

THE 60/40 RULE FOR CLIENT ATTENTION AND CLIENT RETENTION: LISTENING

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
October 15, 2010

THE 60/40 RULE FOR CLIENT ATTENTION AND CLIENT RETENTION: LISTENINGWhat's the best way to ensure that you're giving your cloient the attention and focus s/he deserves and that they will pay attention to what yu have to say? Try following the 60/40 rule, where you get the client talking 60% of the time and formulate your responses in a way that takes up a smaller percentage of the conversation.The iconic author and poet Henry David Thoreau once said that “the greatest complement that was ever paid me was when one asked what I thought, and attended to my answer.” And David Bartlett, author of “Making Your Point,” agrees that brevity is important when he suggests we “focus on a clear message supported by just a few carefully chosen and well-focused pieces of evidence.”One of the best ways to be brief and still make a big impact is to use simple and attention-getting statistics, or to develop analogies or comparisons to help prospects quickly grasp the whole story. Whether your legal marketing efforts are being put to work in a speech, or you're simply trying to maximize the value of a one-on-one meeting, you'll benefit by using a few key techniques that allow your focus to stay on the client while you deftly and convincingly make your point.

THE 60/40 RULE FOR CLIENT ATTENTION AND CLIENT RETENTION: LISTENINGWhat's the best way to ensure that you're giving your cloient the attention and focus s/he deserves and that they will pay attention to what yu have to say? Try following the 60/40 rule, where you get the client talking 60% of the time and formulate your responses in a way that takes up a smaller percentage of the conversation.The iconic author and poet Henry David Thoreau once said that “the greatest complement that was ever paid me was when one asked what I thought, and attended to my answer.” And David Bartlett, author of “Making Your Point,” agrees that brevity is important when he suggests we “focus on a clear message supported by just a few carefully chosen and well-focused pieces of evidence.”One of the best ways to be brief and still make a big impact is to use simple and attention-getting statistics, or to develop analogies or comparisons to help prospects quickly grasp the whole story. Whether your legal marketing efforts are being put to work in a speech, or you're simply trying to maximize the value of a one-on-one meeting, you'll benefit by using a few key techniques that allow your focus to stay on the client while you deftly and convincingly make your point.

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.