Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is not an uncommon occurrence that installations need to be made to prepare commercial premises for a tenant's initial occupancy. Ideally, the parties will have a detailed set of plans and specifications prepared by licensed architects and engineers, which can be attached as a lease exhibit. Especially for large construction projects, it is critically important to obtain plans that are as specific as possible to ensure there is no mistake with regard to the work that needs to be done. Even if drawings and site plans are carefully prepared, the amount of litigation related to building installations is staggering.
For a smaller deal, however, the parties may not be able to afford hiring expensive architects and engineers. Nevertheless, the parties may still need to describe, as precisely as they can, the work that needs to be performed. Many owners ' and the lawyers who represent them ' find this to be a daunting task, since they have little or no knowledge relating to building construction matters. To make matters worse, landlords seek to describe the work they are performing (also known as “Landlord's Work” in contract drafting parlance) as vaguely as possible. They want to give themselves as much “wiggle room” as they can to construct improvements as they see fit. For example, if a tenant fails to specify where installations should be placed, a landlord may install them in a manner that will minimize its costs even if such installations make little sense from an operational point of view. Savvy tenants will not let this happen.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.