Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Supreme Court rarely tackles commercial law issues, but has addressed an important franchise law issue this year. Recently, a franchise law case did raise a federal question involving the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (Act). The Act is intended to protect service station dealers from unjust terminations and non-renewal, but did not address constructive termination or nonrenewal. On March 2, 2010, the Court unanimously held that a franchisee that stays in business cannot sue for constructive termination under the Act. The Court also decided that a franchisee waives its constructive nonrenewal claim when it actually enters into a renewal agreement.
These decisions by the Supreme Court are more than mere questions of whether the dealers can obtain a federal forum. Under the Act, not only are the dealers entitled to a federal forum, but in addition, they are granted a relaxed standard in order to obtain a preliminary injunction against termination or nonrenewal and enhanced recovery of damages in the form of counsel and expert fees.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.