Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Federal statutes protecting whistleblowers are on the rise. Most recently, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“The Dodd-Frank Act”), meant to overhaul and strengthen federal oversight of the financial system, included workplace protections for whistleblowers in the financial services industry. But that is not the only new law to include whistleblower protections. In addition to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”) (see “The Recovery Act's Daunting Whistleblower Provisions,” Employment Law Strategist, Oct. 2009), several other federal whistleblower protection statutes have been enacted or modified in the last few years. These new statutes, including the Consumer Products Safety Improvement Act (2008), the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (2009), and The Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, when combined with the Dodd-Frank Act and ARRA, dramatically expand retaliation protections for millions of employees who blow the whistle on workplace wrongdoing.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.