Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
October 28, 2010

GEORGIA

Botox Manufacturer Agrees To Guilty Plea and Combined Criminal and Civil Penalty

On Sept. 1, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia announced that Allergan Inc., the Irvine, CA-based pharmaceutical manufacturer, had agreed to plead guilty and pay $600 million in connection with the company's off-label promotion of its biological product, Botox. The settlement figure, which remains subject to approval by the district court, includes a criminal fine and forfeiture totaling $375 million and a civil settlement with both the federal government and the states totaling $225 million.

The federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requires that companies specify the intended use for each biological product in the corresponding products' applications to the FDA, whose approval is then granted for each specified use that is safe and effective. It is a federal crime for manufacturers to promote “off-label” uses, defined as those not approved by the FDA.

Sally Quillian Yates, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, described the settlement, in part, by stating, “The FDA had approved therapeutic uses of Botox for only four rare conditions, yet Allergan made it a top corporate priority to maximize sales of far more lucrative off-label uses that were not approved by FDA. Allergan further demanded tremendous growth in these off-label sales year after year, even when there was little clinical evidence that these uses were effective. The FDA approval process ensures that pharmaceutical companies market their medications for uses that are proven to be effective, and this case demonstrates that companies that fail to comply with these rules face criminal prosecution and stiff penalties.”

The government's involvement was prompted by the filing of a False Claims Act (FCA) complaint in Georgia against the company by a consultant and sales representative for the company. This complaint was followed by whistleblower complaints in the Districts of Massachusetts and Maryland, filed by two former Allergan employees and another company sales representative, respectively.


MICHIGAN

$140.9-Million Plea Agreement for
Price Fixing By Panasonic Corp. and Whirlpool Corp. Subsidiary

On Sept. 30, the DOJ announced that it had reached an agreement with the Japanese Panasonic Corporation, and a Delaware-based subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, Embraco North America Inc., for the companies' respective roles in an international price-fixing conspiracy involving refrigerant compressors used in both residential and commercial applications. The agreement, which requires court approval, includes a guilty plea by each entity to a violation of the Sherman Act, as well as combined payment of $140.9 million in criminal fines. For its part, Panasonic agreed to pay a $49.1 million criminal fine, while Embraco agreed to pay a $91.8 million criminal fine.


In the Courts and Business Crimes Hotline were written by Associate Editor Kenneth S. Clark and Matthew J. Alexander, respectively. Both are associates at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC.

GEORGIA

Botox Manufacturer Agrees To Guilty Plea and Combined Criminal and Civil Penalty

On Sept. 1, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia announced that Allergan Inc., the Irvine, CA-based pharmaceutical manufacturer, had agreed to plead guilty and pay $600 million in connection with the company's off-label promotion of its biological product, Botox. The settlement figure, which remains subject to approval by the district court, includes a criminal fine and forfeiture totaling $375 million and a civil settlement with both the federal government and the states totaling $225 million.

The federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requires that companies specify the intended use for each biological product in the corresponding products' applications to the FDA, whose approval is then granted for each specified use that is safe and effective. It is a federal crime for manufacturers to promote “off-label” uses, defined as those not approved by the FDA.

Sally Quillian Yates, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, described the settlement, in part, by stating, “The FDA had approved therapeutic uses of Botox for only four rare conditions, yet Allergan made it a top corporate priority to maximize sales of far more lucrative off-label uses that were not approved by FDA. Allergan further demanded tremendous growth in these off-label sales year after year, even when there was little clinical evidence that these uses were effective. The FDA approval process ensures that pharmaceutical companies market their medications for uses that are proven to be effective, and this case demonstrates that companies that fail to comply with these rules face criminal prosecution and stiff penalties.”

The government's involvement was prompted by the filing of a False Claims Act (FCA) complaint in Georgia against the company by a consultant and sales representative for the company. This complaint was followed by whistleblower complaints in the Districts of Massachusetts and Maryland, filed by two former Allergan employees and another company sales representative, respectively.


MICHIGAN

$140.9-Million Plea Agreement for
Price Fixing By Panasonic Corp. and Whirlpool Corp. Subsidiary

On Sept. 30, the DOJ announced that it had reached an agreement with the Japanese Panasonic Corporation, and a Delaware-based subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, Embraco North America Inc., for the companies' respective roles in an international price-fixing conspiracy involving refrigerant compressors used in both residential and commercial applications. The agreement, which requires court approval, includes a guilty plea by each entity to a violation of the Sherman Act, as well as combined payment of $140.9 million in criminal fines. For its part, Panasonic agreed to pay a $49.1 million criminal fine, while Embraco agreed to pay a $91.8 million criminal fine.


In the Courts and Business Crimes Hotline were written by Associate Editor Kenneth S. Clark and Matthew J. Alexander, respectively. Both are associates at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.