Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesTopicsLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Arbitration Clause Doesn't Cover Dispute Over Movie Payments

By Stan Soocher
November 29, 2010

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that a suit, alleging a distributor of made-for-TV-movies failed to pay amounts owed the films' producer, wasn't subject to an arbitration clause in the parties' distribution agreement. MAT Movies & Television Productions GmbH & Co. v. RHI Entertainment Distribution LLC, 10 CIV. 1405. The distribution contract stated that MAT and RHI would arbitrate “any dispute between the parties hereto with respect to this Agreement.” But after a dispute arose over the monies RHI owed MAT, the distributor and the producer entered into a settlement agreement that provided for an audit by PricewaterhouseCoopers ' and arbitration in the event that either MAT or RHI “disputes the Audit Amount.” MAT later sued claiming that RHI breached the settlement agreement by not paying MAT installments of the audit amount.

Allowing the suit to proceed, District Judge Sidney H. Stein noted that “in this action neither party disputes the Audit Amount or even suggests that plaintiff's claim falls within the Settlement Agreement's narrow arbitration clause. Instead, this motion [by RHI to dismiss MAT's suit or stay it pending arbitration] turns on whether the broader arbitration clause in the earlier Distribution Agreement applies to a claim alleging breach of the later Settlement Agreement.”

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.