Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Sony BMG Denied Stay of Download Royalties Suit

By Stan Soocher
November 29, 2010

A magistrate for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York refused to stay a class action suit by BMG recording artists that is seeking 50% of net revenues the record label receives from digital download, ringtone and ringback sales. The Youngbloods v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment Inc., Civ. 2394(GBD)(KNF). Sony BMG moved to stay the suit after it filed its own action in August 2010, in the Northern District of California, against the members of the 1960s folk rock group The Youngbloods. The California complaint asks for rescission of a 1995 agreement between The Youngbloods and BMG on the ground that the artists allegedly made false representations and warranties in the 1995 contract.

In its bid to have The Youngblood's New York action stayed while the California case is litigated, BMG argued that “resolving the merits of rescission before delving [in the New York litigation] into the intricacies of contractual interpretation, the custom and practice of the recording industry, and class certification would spare the parties and the Court from researching, briefing, and deciding complex issues that may be rendered entirely unnecessary by a simple ruling on rescission.”

But U.S. Magistrate Judge Kevin N. Fox noted: “In light of the fact that the two related actions [i.e., The Youngbloods New York suit and a pending parallel New York class action involving Sony label artists, Allman v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment Inc., 06 Civ. 3252(GBD)(KNF)] contain identical claims against the defendant for breach of contract concerning royalties for digital downloads leased to music download service providers and mobile phone ringtone and ringback providers, the outcome of the California action is irrelevant to the Court's obligations to manage its cases and use judicial resources efficiently.” However, Magistrate Fox did grant Sony BMG's motion to amend its answer in The Youngbloods New York case to raise rescission of the 1995 agreement as an affirmative defense.


Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via stansoocher.com.

A magistrate for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York refused to stay a class action suit by BMG recording artists that is seeking 50% of net revenues the record label receives from digital download, ringtone and ringback sales. The Youngbloods v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment Inc., Civ. 2394(GBD)(KNF). Sony BMG moved to stay the suit after it filed its own action in August 2010, in the Northern District of California, against the members of the 1960s folk rock group The Youngbloods. The California complaint asks for rescission of a 1995 agreement between The Youngbloods and BMG on the ground that the artists allegedly made false representations and warranties in the 1995 contract.

In its bid to have The Youngblood's New York action stayed while the California case is litigated, BMG argued that “resolving the merits of rescission before delving [in the New York litigation] into the intricacies of contractual interpretation, the custom and practice of the recording industry, and class certification would spare the parties and the Court from researching, briefing, and deciding complex issues that may be rendered entirely unnecessary by a simple ruling on rescission.”

But U.S. Magistrate Judge Kevin N. Fox noted: “In light of the fact that the two related actions [i.e., The Youngbloods New York suit and a pending parallel New York class action involving Sony label artists, Allman v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment Inc., 06 Civ. 3252(GBD)(KNF)] contain identical claims against the defendant for breach of contract concerning royalties for digital downloads leased to music download service providers and mobile phone ringtone and ringback providers, the outcome of the California action is irrelevant to the Court's obligations to manage its cases and use judicial resources efficiently.” However, Magistrate Fox did grant Sony BMG's motion to amend its answer in The Youngbloods New York case to raise rescission of the 1995 agreement as an affirmative defense.


Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via stansoocher.com.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.