Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
December 21, 2010

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

$137.3 Million Global Restitution Agreement with Bank of America

On Dec. 7, 2010, the DOJ announced that Bank of America entities had reached a global agreement with the SEC, the IRS, the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC), and 20 State Attorneys General, in connection with the company's voluntary disclosure of its participation in a bid-rigging conspiracy within the municipal bond derivatives market. Specifically, Bank of America's employees rigged bids and engaged in related deceptive practices as part of the sales and marketing for tax-exempt municipal bond derivatives contracts. As part of the global agreement and as a condition of its subsequent admission into the DOJ's Antitrust Corporate Leniency Program, Bank of America agreed to pay total restitution of $137.3 million to federal and state agencies, including municipalities harmed by the anticompetitive activities. The bank also reached an agreement with the Federal Reserve Board regarding remedial measures.

According to the government, Bank of America was both the first and only entity to report its anticompetitive conduct in the municipal bond derivatives market to the DOJ prior to the department opening its continuing investigation that, to date, has led to guilty pleas by eight executives for antitrust and related federal crimes, in addition to pending charges against one corporate entity and seven additional executives. No penalties will be levied against Bank of America as part of the agreements, in further recognition of its voluntary disclosure to the Antitrust Division. If Bank of America and its current employees continue to cooperate with the Department and successfully complete the additional requirements for a participant in the Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division will not proceed with prosecution against either.

In announcing the agreement, Christine Varney, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the DOJ's Antitrust Division, stated: “Bank of America's disclosure of wrongdoing and cooperation has led to an aggressive, ongoing investigation by the Department of Justice in anticompetitive activity in the municipal bond derivatives industry. The bank's participation in the leniency program has also resulted in today's resolution to address the harm caused by its wrongdoing. The Division's investigation of this matter continues and the prosecution of anticompetitive conduct in the financial markets remains our highest priority.”

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

$137.3 Million Global Restitution Agreement with Bank of America

On Dec. 7, 2010, the DOJ announced that Bank of America entities had reached a global agreement with the SEC, the IRS, the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC), and 20 State Attorneys General, in connection with the company's voluntary disclosure of its participation in a bid-rigging conspiracy within the municipal bond derivatives market. Specifically, Bank of America's employees rigged bids and engaged in related deceptive practices as part of the sales and marketing for tax-exempt municipal bond derivatives contracts. As part of the global agreement and as a condition of its subsequent admission into the DOJ's Antitrust Corporate Leniency Program, Bank of America agreed to pay total restitution of $137.3 million to federal and state agencies, including municipalities harmed by the anticompetitive activities. The bank also reached an agreement with the Federal Reserve Board regarding remedial measures.

According to the government, Bank of America was both the first and only entity to report its anticompetitive conduct in the municipal bond derivatives market to the DOJ prior to the department opening its continuing investigation that, to date, has led to guilty pleas by eight executives for antitrust and related federal crimes, in addition to pending charges against one corporate entity and seven additional executives. No penalties will be levied against Bank of America as part of the agreements, in further recognition of its voluntary disclosure to the Antitrust Division. If Bank of America and its current employees continue to cooperate with the Department and successfully complete the additional requirements for a participant in the Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division will not proceed with prosecution against either.

In announcing the agreement, Christine Varney, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the DOJ's Antitrust Division, stated: “Bank of America's disclosure of wrongdoing and cooperation has led to an aggressive, ongoing investigation by the Department of Justice in anticompetitive activity in the municipal bond derivatives industry. The bank's participation in the leniency program has also resulted in today's resolution to address the harm caused by its wrongdoing. The Division's investigation of this matter continues and the prosecution of anticompetitive conduct in the financial markets remains our highest priority.”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.