Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Supreme Court Hears California Prison
Overcrowding/Health Care Cases
The State of California argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 30, 2010, that it should not be required to reduce its prison population by 40,000 simply because the quality of health care provided to inmates is less than optimal. The case, Schwarzenegger v. Plata, pits the State against plaintiffs who filed an action in 1990 claiming prisoners received substandard mental health care, and another filed in 2001 saying general health care for all inmates in California is so poor that it violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Courts throughout California have, through the years, weighed in on both cases, and a special master and receiver were appointed to address the issues raised. Ultimately, a three-judge panel was convened in accordance with the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act. In 2009 the panel found that the constitutional violations could largely be blamed on prison overcrowding, and it ordered the State to reduce its prison population to 137.5% of capacity within two years. (California's prisons are currently filled to 200% of maximum capacity.) Questioning of the State of California's counsel, Carter Phillips, a partner in Sidley Austin, suggested the Court was not sympathetic to the State's fiscal woes. For instance, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, noting that the mental health class action had been ongoing for 20 years and had been the subject of 70 court orders, asked, “How much longer do we have to wait [for adequate prisoner mental health care]? Another 20 years?”
Joint Commission to Address Hand-Off Communication Breakdowns
The Joint Commission is working on a Targeted Solutions Tool' (TST) aimed at improving hand-off communications, in the same vein as its earlier TST for hand hygiene. The new TST will address the communications problems often experienced by medical personnel as they change shifts, which can lead to medical mistakes. These communication breakdowns often occur because information given to incoming personnel is incomplete, or there is little time allotted for such communication. To develop the new tools, the Joint Commission worked with 10 hospitals and health care systems, beginning in 2009. Before implementing improvements, the 10 volunteer entities took a baseline measurement of hand-off communication difficulties and discovered that there were problems 37% of the time. Beginning this year, these same 10 health care providers will pilot test the communications improvements formulated through their team effort with the Joint Commission. After they are pilot tested, it is expected that the new hand-off solutions will be added to the TST in the second half of 2011. For information on the proposed solutions, go to: http://www.centerfortransforminghealthcare.org/news/display.aspx?newsid=23.
Supreme Court Hears California Prison
Overcrowding/Health Care Cases
The State of California argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 30, 2010, that it should not be required to reduce its prison population by 40,000 simply because the quality of health care provided to inmates is less than optimal. The case, Schwarzenegger v. Plata, pits the State against plaintiffs who filed an action in 1990 claiming prisoners received substandard mental health care, and another filed in 2001 saying general health care for all inmates in California is so poor that it violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Courts throughout California have, through the years, weighed in on both cases, and a special master and receiver were appointed to address the issues raised. Ultimately, a three-judge panel was convened in accordance with the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act. In 2009 the panel found that the constitutional violations could largely be blamed on prison overcrowding, and it ordered the State to reduce its prison population to 137.5% of capacity within two years. (California's prisons are currently filled to 200% of maximum capacity.) Questioning of the State of California's counsel, Carter Phillips, a partner in
Joint Commission to Address Hand-Off Communication Breakdowns
The Joint Commission is working on a Targeted Solutions Tool' (TST) aimed at improving hand-off communications, in the same vein as its earlier TST for hand hygiene. The new TST will address the communications problems often experienced by medical personnel as they change shifts, which can lead to medical mistakes. These communication breakdowns often occur because information given to incoming personnel is incomplete, or there is little time allotted for such communication. To develop the new tools, the Joint Commission worked with 10 hospitals and health care systems, beginning in 2009. Before implementing improvements, the 10 volunteer entities took a baseline measurement of hand-off communication difficulties and discovered that there were problems 37% of the time. Beginning this year, these same 10 health care providers will pilot test the communications improvements formulated through their team effort with the Joint Commission. After they are pilot tested, it is expected that the new hand-off solutions will be added to the TST in the second half of 2011. For information on the proposed solutions, go to: http://www.centerfortransforminghealthcare.org/news/display.aspx?newsid=23.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.