Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Social Networking
Social networking (aka “social media”) is taking over the world. Just look at the latest statistics:
- Facebook alone has more than 500 million users (and growing by the second);
- Fifty percent of its active users log on to Facebook in any given day;
- The average user has 130 friends. (Source: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics).
- If Facebook were a country, it would be the third most populated. (Source: http://www.techxav.com/2010/03/19/if-facebook-were-a-country/).
That is just Facebook, but there are many more social-networking sites, for example, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, YouTube and blog.com, and this list is not all-inclusive.
Not only is social networking taking over how we live, work, communicate and “socialize,” it is changing how lawyers litigate and practice law. What is no surprise is that, as usual, technology and society are light years ahead of the legal world. Many lawyers lack the knowledge and guidance on the discoverability and use of social-networking content in civil litigation and at the workplace. Following is a short discussion of the use of social networking in the work place and the courtroom.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.