Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The commercial real estate broker's lien act is finally a reality in Michigan. After years of indifference, the Michigan legislature finally heeded the pleas of trade organizations like the Michigan Association of Realtors and the Commercial Board of Realtors, and various other interested organizations and their broker-members, and passed Senate Bill No. 610. Signed into law by Governor Granholm on Oct. 5, 2010, the Bill took immediate effect, and will apply to written commission agreements signed after that date. But rejoice not, unless you understand how to use this important but narrowly crafted tool.
What You Need to Know
A commercial real estate broker's lien is only available to Michigan licensed real estate brokers, and is not available to their employees, agents or independent contractors. Three critical elements are required for a commercial real estate broker's lien to attach. First, the broker must have a written commission agreement, signed after Oct. 5, 2010, the effective date of the act. Second, the broker must be entitled to a commission under the written commission agreement. Do not underestimate the importance of this requirement; this entitlement requirement could be the undoing of many poorly written commission agreements. A thorough review of your standard commission agreement should be undertaken immediately to avoid an unpleasant surprise later. And, third, the broker must record a claim of lien in the county where the real property is located before the actual conveyance occurs.
Where a commission is owed for a lease, the claim of lien may be recorded within 60 days after the lease is signed. The time for filing a notice of claim of lien may be forced earlier, however, if the owner notifies the broker of an intent to enter into a lease, which includes a date on which the lease is intended to be signed (such date must be not less than 10 days later), and serves it on the broker. In that case, the broker must file the claim of lien before the intended date of lease signing. Buyer's brokers (and tenant rep brokers) can similarly claim a lien if the buyer purchases the property and records a claim of lien. There are also provisions designed to protect a broker's right to be paid a commission where the commission is to be paid in installments, and for purchase options, and where a commission is due on modifications or extensions of leases.
A Claim of Lien
A claim of lien must include several specific elements, and these are readily available in Section 9 of the commercial real estate broker's lien act, including a form of claim of lien. Within 10 days after recording the claim of lien, however, the broker must provide a copy of the claim of lien to the owner of record of the property and to the party who signed the commission agreement, by certified mail, with return receipt requested, or by personal service. Since a commercial real estate broker's lien is “void and unenforceable” if not properly served, a title search should be undertaken to make sure that service is properly effected on the “owner of record.” In other words, do not trust that the signer of the commission agreement is, in fact, the owner of the property; doing so could render a commercial real estate broker's lien void.
Commercial real estate broker's liens should not prevent real estate transactions from closing, however. Section 5 of the Commercial Real Estate Broker's Lien Act provides that the parties to a transaction shall establish an escrow account for depositing a sum of the proceeds of the transaction sufficient to satisfy the lien, and specifically provides that neither a buyer nor seller shall refuse to close a transaction based on the statutory requirement to establish such an escrow account. There are no penalties stated in the act for recalcitrant buyers or sellers who might refuse to close in spite of Section 5. Where the proceeds of sale are sufficient to satisfy a commercial real estate broker's lien, the lien is automatically extinguished and the broker is obliged to provide a release of its lien. If, however, the proceeds of sale are insufficient to satisfy all liens, then no escrow is required and, presumably, the sale may proceed, but subject to the lien. Just like a mortgage lender, brokers are cautioned to make sure that the property has sufficient equity to support payment of all prior debts for which security is granted, and the commercial real estate broker's lien.
Enforcement
To enforce a commercial real estate broker's lien, the broker may file a complaint to foreclose the lien, and an affidavit that the claim of lien is recorded, in the circuit court for the county where the property is located. The broker must also name as defendants everyone having an interest in the property whose interest would be divested or impaired by foreclosure of the broker's lien. Broker lien foreclosure actions must be brought within one year after the date on which the broker's lien is recorded, or the lien will be null and void, and it cannot be re-filed. In successful foreclosure actions, the court may order sale of any interest in the property, or part thereof, and shall set a period of redemption of not more than four months. Presumably, the court may order a period of redemption shorter than four months. The court can also, in its discretion, award costs to the broker, including reasonable attorneys' fees and prejudgment interest. But brokers beware; one of the main differences between the act and prior bills, was the addition of a provision that allows the court to order litigation costs and attorneys' fees against the broker, if a court determines a foreclosure action to be frivolous.
Conclusion
The Commercial Real Estate Broker's Lien Act is a powerful tool that commercial real estate brokers in Michigan have long sought to protect their right to be paid a commission. As noted above, the act will apply to written commission agreements signed after Oct. 5, 2010. And like any useful tool, it will only work well if used properly, and can, if misused, backfire against the broker.
Steven D. Sallen is President and Chief Executive Officer of Maddin Hauser Wartell Roth & Heller, PC, in Southfield, MI. Mr. Sallen practices real estate, environmental and corporate law. He can be reached at 248-354-4030 or [email protected].
The commercial real estate broker's lien act is finally a reality in Michigan. After years of indifference, the Michigan legislature finally heeded the pleas of trade organizations like the Michigan Association of Realtors and the Commercial Board of Realtors, and various other interested organizations and their broker-members, and passed Senate Bill No. 610. Signed into law by Governor Granholm on Oct. 5, 2010, the Bill took immediate effect, and will apply to written commission agreements signed after that date. But rejoice not, unless you understand how to use this important but narrowly crafted tool.
What You Need to Know
A commercial real estate broker's lien is only available to Michigan licensed real estate brokers, and is not available to their employees, agents or independent contractors. Three critical elements are required for a commercial real estate broker's lien to attach. First, the broker must have a written commission agreement, signed after Oct. 5, 2010, the effective date of the act. Second, the broker must be entitled to a commission under the written commission agreement. Do not underestimate the importance of this requirement; this entitlement requirement could be the undoing of many poorly written commission agreements. A thorough review of your standard commission agreement should be undertaken immediately to avoid an unpleasant surprise later. And, third, the broker must record a claim of lien in the county where the real property is located before the actual conveyance occurs.
Where a commission is owed for a lease, the claim of lien may be recorded within 60 days after the lease is signed. The time for filing a notice of claim of lien may be forced earlier, however, if the owner notifies the broker of an intent to enter into a lease, which includes a date on which the lease is intended to be signed (such date must be not less than 10 days later), and serves it on the broker. In that case, the broker must file the claim of lien before the intended date of lease signing. Buyer's brokers (and tenant rep brokers) can similarly claim a lien if the buyer purchases the property and records a claim of lien. There are also provisions designed to protect a broker's right to be paid a commission where the commission is to be paid in installments, and for purchase options, and where a commission is due on modifications or extensions of leases.
A Claim of Lien
A claim of lien must include several specific elements, and these are readily available in Section 9 of the commercial real estate broker's lien act, including a form of claim of lien. Within 10 days after recording the claim of lien, however, the broker must provide a copy of the claim of lien to the owner of record of the property and to the party who signed the commission agreement, by certified mail, with return receipt requested, or by personal service. Since a commercial real estate broker's lien is “void and unenforceable” if not properly served, a title search should be undertaken to make sure that service is properly effected on the “owner of record.” In other words, do not trust that the signer of the commission agreement is, in fact, the owner of the property; doing so could render a commercial real estate broker's lien void.
Commercial real estate broker's liens should not prevent real estate transactions from closing, however. Section 5 of the Commercial Real Estate Broker's Lien Act provides that the parties to a transaction shall establish an escrow account for depositing a sum of the proceeds of the transaction sufficient to satisfy the lien, and specifically provides that neither a buyer nor seller shall refuse to close a transaction based on the statutory requirement to establish such an escrow account. There are no penalties stated in the act for recalcitrant buyers or sellers who might refuse to close in spite of Section 5. Where the proceeds of sale are sufficient to satisfy a commercial real estate broker's lien, the lien is automatically extinguished and the broker is obliged to provide a release of its lien. If, however, the proceeds of sale are insufficient to satisfy all liens, then no escrow is required and, presumably, the sale may proceed, but subject to the lien. Just like a mortgage lender, brokers are cautioned to make sure that the property has sufficient equity to support payment of all prior debts for which security is granted, and the commercial real estate broker's lien.
Enforcement
To enforce a commercial real estate broker's lien, the broker may file a complaint to foreclose the lien, and an affidavit that the claim of lien is recorded, in the circuit court for the county where the property is located. The broker must also name as defendants everyone having an interest in the property whose interest would be divested or impaired by foreclosure of the broker's lien. Broker lien foreclosure actions must be brought within one year after the date on which the broker's lien is recorded, or the lien will be null and void, and it cannot be re-filed. In successful foreclosure actions, the court may order sale of any interest in the property, or part thereof, and shall set a period of redemption of not more than four months. Presumably, the court may order a period of redemption shorter than four months. The court can also, in its discretion, award costs to the broker, including reasonable attorneys' fees and prejudgment interest. But brokers beware; one of the main differences between the act and prior bills, was the addition of a provision that allows the court to order litigation costs and attorneys' fees against the broker, if a court determines a foreclosure action to be frivolous.
Conclusion
The Commercial Real Estate Broker's Lien Act is a powerful tool that commercial real estate brokers in Michigan have long sought to protect their right to be paid a commission. As noted above, the act will apply to written commission agreements signed after Oct. 5, 2010. And like any useful tool, it will only work well if used properly, and can, if misused, backfire against the broker.
Steven D. Sallen is President and Chief Executive Officer of
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?