Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Mass casualty disasters can take various forms: hurricanes, floods, ice storms, tornados, plane or bus crashes, and today, even terrorist attacks. And hospitals and other health-care entities are on the front lines.They do an incredible job preparing for such disasters; most conduct full-blown drills on a regular basis. But with so much to consider, it is easy to overlook seemingly small details that can pose critical problems during and after the disaster.
That's where in-house counsel at hospitals and health-care entities, especially those who are part of a risk management department, come in. In-housers can help their clients avoid practical and legal headaches by ensuring that appropriate personnel, supplies, equipment and other resources are ready to care for an influx of patients. With thorough preparation, counsel also can avert legal problems such as employees' wage-and-hour claims, negligence or wage claims by employees' family members, and patient medical-malpractice claims.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.