Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If We Could Do It Over Again '
New law offices are opening every day: Some are opening because large firm partners are departing to start their own smaller firms; some because junior lawyers can't find work in established firms; some when firms expand to a new city; and some aren't traditional offices at all ' they're home or remote offices that, although for one or two people, have technology and connectivity issues nonetheless.
Law firm owners and administrators ' especially ones who have been part of law firms in the past ' often think that because they have operated in a legal environment before, they can easily select systems, have them installed and be up and running.
Wrong! As business and operations advisers know, no two setups are exactly the same. Goals for a smaller or remote office are not necessarily the same as for existing headquarters. And, with the constant updating of technology, prior decisions need to be revisited. What's more, pricing is almost never quoted in easy-to-compare ways. Practicing attorneys, especially when departing a firm to start their own, need to keep their eyes on the client ball, and often don't have the background or time to make technology decisions.
Over the past year, I have advised several groups of lawyers departing larger firms to start their own smaller ones. I've also worked with many small firms who needed seamless, upgraded connectivity to remote offices and wireless devices. Those clients who took the time to plan up front with experienced advisers fared the best by far. Those who did things by delegating to other partners, or by asking friends for technology experts without ample due diligence or reference checking, wasted a lot of money and experienced untold frustration.
Having efficient systems in place to handle technology when lawyers and staff departed vastly helped client relations, and also avoided exposure and expense.
Here are some lessons learned by my law firm clients, many of them the hard way.
1. Practicing lawyers are not technology advisers. Lawyers starting their own firm should tend to the business of law and client service. Those who assume the role of technology “guru” invariably run out of time and patience, only to have to undo mistakes in selection and installation.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.