Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Credit underwriting cycles have a predictable rhythm: Commercial lenders make ever-riskier loans during boom periods and then, during the busts that follow, often see their claims or liens attacked following the bankruptcy cases of their borrowers, either by the borrowers, their trustee or the official committee of unsecured creditors appointed in the case. The current recession is mature enough that a significant number of bankruptcies involving challenges to the secured claims of lenders have percolated to the point of decision.
Here, we discuss two recent cases involving equitable subordination in bankruptcy that should inform the conduct of lenders when dealing with financially deteriorating borrowers, especially in such matters as credit facility amendments, forbearance agreements and providing additional financing.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.