Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b>Practice Notes: </b>Reality TV Shows Give Lawyers New Client Base

By Drew Combs
February 28, 2011

After the first season of The Real Housewives of Atlanta ended in 2008, four of the Bravo show's stars said they wanted to be paid more for the second season. To handle the negotiations, the women tapped Los Angeles-based Darrell Miller, a partner in Fox Rothschild. Miller, now a co-chair of the firm's sports and entertainment group, says he was able to hammer out new contracts for the second season that increased his clients' salaries and gave them greater flexibility to capitalize on personal appearances, as well as licensing and product promotion opportunities.

The rise of reality TV may have hurt the market for writers and actors, but it has provided an additional income stream for a select group of entertainment attorneys. One reason: union rules governing wages, breaks and time worked don't apply to reality shows. As a result, media companies can hire people who are happy, at least initially, to be on TV for little pay.

“With reality programming, you don't have the protection and norms that the guilds have created,” says Darin Frank, an Eisner Frank & Kahan partner, chair of the Beverly Hills firm's entertainment department, and attorney who has represented the producers of MTV's Jersey Shore and the stars of The History Channel's Pawn Stars.

“I have seen deals where talent was being paid as little as $2,000 for an entire season,” Miller says. “I have to start out behind the eight ball when people have negotiated a bad deal because they signed whatever was put in front of them, or they were inadequately represented. But if a show is a big ratings hit, it is hard for [the network and producers] to argue that the people responsible for those ratings shouldn't get more money.”

Miller built his entertainment practice representing traditional celebrities like actress Angela Bassett and rapper/actor Chris “Ludacris” Bridges. Now, negotiating reality TV deals for, among others, contestants on NBC's The Apprentice and The Biggest Loser as well as ABC's The Bachelor, accounts for 15% of his practice. (Five years ago, he says, it represented about 5%.) While Miller won't say how much these deals are worth, the Atlanta housewives reportedly made between $10,000 and $30,000 per episode on last fall's third season. More money for his clients means more money for Miller, whose fee is a percentage of a deal's total value.

Though demands for more money or greater creative control have become a rite of passage for reality TV stars and their lawyers, networks do push back with attorneys of their own. In October, Williams & Connolly represented Discovery Communications Inc. in a $3 million suit against two stars of Discovery Channel's Deadliest Catch who had allegedly balked at taking part in a spin-off. (The parties eventually settled.) The firm previously brought suit on Discovery's behalf against reality star Jon Gosselin, formerly of TLC's Jon & Kate Plus 8, for allegedly breaching his contractual obligations by appearing on other shows and revealing information about the show. Gosselin countersued and the case settled. With Jon and Kate splitting up, the show returned to TLC last year as Kate Plus 8 ' proving that even in reality TV, the show must go on.


Drew Combs reports for The American Lawyer, an ALM affiliate publication of Entertainment Law & Finance.

After the first season of The Real Housewives of Atlanta ended in 2008, four of the Bravo show's stars said they wanted to be paid more for the second season. To handle the negotiations, the women tapped Los Angeles-based Darrell Miller, a partner in Fox Rothschild. Miller, now a co-chair of the firm's sports and entertainment group, says he was able to hammer out new contracts for the second season that increased his clients' salaries and gave them greater flexibility to capitalize on personal appearances, as well as licensing and product promotion opportunities.

The rise of reality TV may have hurt the market for writers and actors, but it has provided an additional income stream for a select group of entertainment attorneys. One reason: union rules governing wages, breaks and time worked don't apply to reality shows. As a result, media companies can hire people who are happy, at least initially, to be on TV for little pay.

“With reality programming, you don't have the protection and norms that the guilds have created,” says Darin Frank, an Eisner Frank & Kahan partner, chair of the Beverly Hills firm's entertainment department, and attorney who has represented the producers of MTV's Jersey Shore and the stars of The History Channel's Pawn Stars.

“I have seen deals where talent was being paid as little as $2,000 for an entire season,” Miller says. “I have to start out behind the eight ball when people have negotiated a bad deal because they signed whatever was put in front of them, or they were inadequately represented. But if a show is a big ratings hit, it is hard for [the network and producers] to argue that the people responsible for those ratings shouldn't get more money.”

Miller built his entertainment practice representing traditional celebrities like actress Angela Bassett and rapper/actor Chris “Ludacris” Bridges. Now, negotiating reality TV deals for, among others, contestants on NBC's The Apprentice and The Biggest Loser as well as ABC's The Bachelor, accounts for 15% of his practice. (Five years ago, he says, it represented about 5%.) While Miller won't say how much these deals are worth, the Atlanta housewives reportedly made between $10,000 and $30,000 per episode on last fall's third season. More money for his clients means more money for Miller, whose fee is a percentage of a deal's total value.

Though demands for more money or greater creative control have become a rite of passage for reality TV stars and their lawyers, networks do push back with attorneys of their own. In October, Williams & Connolly represented Discovery Communications Inc. in a $3 million suit against two stars of Discovery Channel's Deadliest Catch who had allegedly balked at taking part in a spin-off. (The parties eventually settled.) The firm previously brought suit on Discovery's behalf against reality star Jon Gosselin, formerly of TLC's Jon & Kate Plus 8, for allegedly breaching his contractual obligations by appearing on other shows and revealing information about the show. Gosselin countersued and the case settled. With Jon and Kate splitting up, the show returned to TLC last year as Kate Plus 8 ' proving that even in reality TV, the show must go on.


Drew Combs reports for The American Lawyer, an ALM affiliate publication of Entertainment Law & Finance.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

Generative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses Image

GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter? Image

A recent research paper offers up some unexpected results regarding the best ways to manage retirement income.