Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Patent Reform Bill Passes Senate
The America Invents Act, S. 23, passed the Senate on a 95-5 vote, sending it to the House for consideration. The bill represents the first major change in U.S. patent law since the 1950s, and enjoys broad bipartisan support from legislators as well as the White House and USPTO Director David Kappos. Major features of the Senate bill include transitioning from a first-to-invent to first-to-file system; allowing the USPTO to set its own fees and keep the fees it generates; and changing the post-grant review process. The two fee-related measures, allowing the USPTO to set its own fees and keep any excess fees it generates, are designed to reduce the enormous current backlog of unexamined patent applications.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.