Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</i></b> Business Community OK with New ADAA Implementation

The business and disability rights communities are uniting behind long-awaited, final regulations implementing the 2008 Americans With Disabilities Amendments Act. The regulations become effective on May 24, 2011.

10 minute readApril 07, 2011 at 03:22 PM
By
Marcia Coyle
<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</i></b> Business Community OK with New ADAA Implementation

The business and disability rights communities are uniting behind long-awaited, finalregulations implementing the 2008 Americans With Disabilities Amendments Act. The regulations become effective on May 24, 2011.

Their reaction to the regulations, published on March 25 in the Federal Register by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, is a dramatic change from strong criticism, particularly from businesses, of a first attempt in 2009.

'What happened was there is a new commission now,' said management attorney Lawrence Lorber, a partner at Proskauer Rose. 'They pulled back and wrote regulations very consistent with the statute.'

The 2008 ADAA law overturned several U.S. Supreme Court decisions narrowing the definition of disability in the landmark Americans With Disabilities Act. For example, people with cancer, diabetes or epilepsy were denied coverage under the law.

'The regulations developed by the commission to implement the ADAA clarify the requirements of the law for all stakeholders,' said EEOC chair Jacqueline Berrien, an Obama appointee. They also are the result of a bipartisan effort by the EEOC to 'hold true' to the bipartisan intent of Congress, according to Commissioner Constance Barker.

Commissioner Chai Feldblum, an Obama appointee and one of the key negotiators in the drafting of the original ADA and the ADAA, said the regulations would 'work well' both for people with disabilities and employers.

The 2008 statute and the new regulations keep the definition of disability in the original ADA: a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; a record or history of impairment or being regarded as having a disability. But the 2008 law made significant changes in how those terms are interpreted, and the regulations implement those changes, according to the EEOC.

For example, the regulations clarify the term 'major life activities' includes 'major bodily functions,' such as functions of the immune system, normal cell growth, and brain, neurological and endocrine functions. They also make clear that, as under the original ADA, not every impairment will constitute a disability. The regulations include examples of impairments that should easily be concluded to be disabilities, such as HIV infection, diabetes, epilepsy and bipolar disorder.

The regulations also make it easier for people to establish coverage under the 'regarded as' part of the definition of disability. Under the new law, the focus is on how the person was treated rather than on what an employer believes about the nature of someone's impairment.

'The commission is to be commended for undertaking the hard work needed to reach bipartisan agreement that has been a hallmark of the Americans with Disabilities Act for the last two decades,' Randel Johnson, senior vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said in a statement. 'We know firsthand that these issues can be exceedingly difficult. While we have only begun to review the final regulation, it is clear that the commission gave substantive consideration to our comments and those of other stakeholders.'

The regulations will greatly simplify the determination of whether a person has a disability and allow courts and other decision makers to turn quickly to determining whether unlawful discrimination has occurred in the workplace, according to the American Association of People with Disabilities.


Marcia Coyle writes for The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Employment Law Strategist.

The business

This premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

Letter Agreement Between Landlord and Tenant Did Not Extinguish GuarantyTreble Damage Award Upheld; Landlord Failed to Establish Overcharge Was Not WillfulDenying Access to Landlord Constituted Breach Entitling Landlord to PossessionTenant Entitled to Yellowstone Injunction With Respect to Taxes and Sewer Charges

March 01, 2026

New York is one of the first states to adopt laws to regulate artificial intelligence use in advertising and to strengthen post-mortem publicity rights regarding AI-generated replicas and “synthetic performers.” Given the state’s role as a bellwether for consumer-protection and advertising regulation, these new laws, combined with the state’s broader AI legislative framework, represent a shift toward transparency, consent and accountability.

March 01, 2026

State app store age verification regimes do more than reallocate responsibility between platforms and developers. They create a new data supply chain for age knowledge, one that can move COPPA questions from “do we ask age?” to “what do we do when the platform tells us?” The teams that handle this best will treat platform age signals as sensitive compliance inputs: minimize them, tightly control where they flow, and design product behavior so that minors do not trigger unnecessary collection or disclosure.

March 01, 2026

The firms leading right now chose to ask what would become possible if they managed the entire revenue lifecycle — from invoice generation to cash receipt — in one place, and what AI could actually accomplish with complete data instead of partial feeds. That is the Power of One.

March 01, 2026

A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), United States v. Heppner, has generated outsized commentary suggesting that the use of generative AI tools may jeopardize attorney-client privilege. A closer reading shows something far less dramatic.

March 01, 2026