Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In its recent unanimous decision in Staub v. Proctor Hospital, 131 S.Ct. 45 (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court both recognized the concept of “cat's paw” liability in employment discrimination cases ' where a biased non'decision-maker acts to bring about the termination of an employee by improperly influencing an unbiased decision-maker ' and sharpened its claws. In its opinion, which was the first time the Supreme Court had addressed the issue since a 1990 Seventh Circuit decision coined the term ' the court upheld cat's paw liability as a viable theory and struck down a commonly accepted exception. As a result, Staub has significant implications for all employers ' and greatly increases potential liability.
Previous Cat's Paw Precedent
In its 1990 ruling in Shager v. Upjohn Co., 913 F.2d 398, (7th Cir. 1990), the Seventh Circuit first recognized the “cat's paw” theory of liability. To establish a cat's paw case under Seventh Circuit standards, a plaintiff had to show that the non'decision-maker exerted “singular influence” over the decision-maker in order to harm the plaintiff for discriminatory reasons. Even though the non'decision-maker may lack formal authority to take adverse action, the employer is still liable. However, to prevent this theory from “spiraling out of control,” the Seventh Circuit developed an exception. If a decision-maker conducts an independent investigation into the facts and is not “wholly dependent” on the improper influence, the employer is not liable. Thus, so long as the decision-maker did not simply take the non'decision-maker's word for it, any resulting action is to be respected as a product of unbiased analysis.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.