Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Legal RFP's
April 29, 2011
LEGAL RFP'S – To respond or to not respond; that is the question?[The first in a blog series on Legal RFP's]Shakespeare's classic question focuses debate on a serious leadership challenge for law firm decision makers. It also requires the corporate/agency rfp sponsor to carefully consider the information it should make available to the firms who will be responding. As a business development consultant advising clients on the efficacy of responding to rfp's, let me present the questions to be asked and answered.* How did we make the invitation list? Is this recognition of past attorney marketing efforts, client service, or just a random pull?* Who prepared the RFP? We are seeing a significant increase in the number of legal services purchased through a purchasing department. So what type of mentality wrote the damned thing, and who will be reviewing it? Consider the Miller-Heiman proposition that one must identify the “user/buyer (s).” In other words, is the person you are meeting with or talking with be actually using the services? Will he/she need to get approval from a “buyer” who may or may not be identified in the rfp process? And how do you find out?In our next blog, we'll propose more critical questions when deciding to respond to an RFP or for the sponsor of the RFP to consider.
LEGAL RFP'S – To respond or to not respond; that is the question?[The first in a blog series on Legal RFP's]Shakespeare's classic question focuses debate on a serious leadership challenge for law firm decision makers. It also requires the corporate/agency rfp sponsor to carefully consider the information it should make available to the firms who will be responding. As a business development consultant advising clients on the efficacy of responding to rfp's, let me present the questions to be asked and answered.* How did we make the invitation list? Is this recognition of past attorney marketing efforts, client service, or just a random pull?* Who prepared the RFP? We are seeing a significant increase in the number of legal services purchased through a purchasing department. So what type of mentality wrote the damned thing, and who will be reviewing it? Consider the Miller-Heiman proposition that one must identify the “user/buyer (s).” In other words, is the person you are meeting with or talking with be actually using the services? Will he/she need to get approval from a “buyer” who may or may not be identified in the rfp process? And how do you find out?In our next blog, we'll propose more critical questions when deciding to respond to an RFP or for the sponsor of the RFP to consider.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.