Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
LEGAL RFP'S II.
May 13, 2011
LEGAL RFP'S II. – Continuing the discussion of whether or not to respond to RFP's, here are additional critical questions to ask.* Who will be reviewing the submittals, what time period has been allotted and are their objectives clearly stated in the document? If not, will the issuer permit contact prior to submittal. And if yes, is this person clearly identified?* Is the company now using rfp's for all legal work, or just for specialties such as Labor and Employment?* Do they require you to respond in a formal, section by section approach? If the answer is yes, we often identify methods for our clients to add a key sentence or two in each section highlighting the firm's strength to match the stated need. And do include color and graphics wherever possible* Will you be advised who is on the interview team?Keep in mind that the answers to these and the other questions should be used to make a business decisioin on whether or not to proceed. More next time.Allan Colman, [email protected]
LEGAL RFP'S II. – Continuing the discussion of whether or not to respond to RFP's, here are additional critical questions to ask.* Who will be reviewing the submittals, what time period has been allotted and are their objectives clearly stated in the document? If not, will the issuer permit contact prior to submittal. And if yes, is this person clearly identified?* Is the company now using rfp's for all legal work, or just for specialties such as Labor and Employment?* Do they require you to respond in a formal, section by section approach? If the answer is yes, we often identify methods for our clients to add a key sentence or two in each section highlighting the firm's strength to match the stated need. And do include color and graphics wherever possible* Will you be advised who is on the interview team?Keep in mind that the answers to these and the other questions should be used to make a business decisioin on whether or not to proceed. More next time.Allan Colman, [email protected]
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.