Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is a common occurrence in the emergency department for a patient to be transferred from one facility to another. Generally speaking, Federal law ' specifically the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) ' provides regulatory oversight regarding transfers.
However, there are few cases extending the EMTALA regulatory scheme to private causes of action for malpractice. And some states provide an immunity defense for emergency care providers unless there is proof of “gross negligence.” In such states, the immunity defense may apply through the time the patient is “stabilized.” What is less clear, however, is whether the immunity applies when the patient needs to transferred to a different medical facility for appropriate treatment of the emergency condition. In such situations, some of the questions include whether the emergency department providers arranging for the transfer are still entitled to immunity, whether the immunity is limited by time, or whether the immunity ends because of the amount of time it took to acquire the transfer.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.