Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When Cheryl J. Scarboro, Chief of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement unit, remarked in November 2010 that her unit “will continue to focus on industry-wide sweeps and [that] no industry is immune from [FCPA] investigation,” the financial services industry would have been wise to take notice. Now, with news that the SEC is examining whether banks and private equity firms have run afoul of the FCPA in their dealings with sovereign wealth funds (SWFs), Scarboro's remarks are no longer merely a harbinger for FCPA enforcement activity ' they represent the reality facing the financial services industry.
Scarboro's comments and the SEC's recent SWFs inquiries are even more significant when viewed in the context of FCPA enforcement activity in 2010, which was a record year for both the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the statute's enforcers. Consider that, in 2010, the DOJ and SEC: 1) collected eight of the 10 highest monetary penalties ever paid over the 33-year history of the FCPA; 2) brought a combined 74 enforcement actions, nearly doubling the then'record-setting 40 enforcement actions brought in 2009; and 3) focused their enforcement efforts on particular industries. As Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer remarked: “[W]e are in a new era of FCPA enforcement; and we are here to stay.” Given the DOJ's and SEC's focus on coordinating FCPA enforcement efforts, this “new era” clearly now includes the financial services industry. Accordingly, financial services firms should re-examine their FCPA compliance efforts and proactively manage their FCPA risks.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.